Thanks for the many replies, I'll comment on a few of them:
At 05:46 PM 2/2/03 +0100, Lukas Pietsch wrote:
Your F725 Unknown-2, to me, looks like a German SCRIPT CAPITAL S,
(compare with U+2112;SCRIPT CAPITAL L). Yes, we were taught to write an
S like this in school. Perhaps it's used somewhere
Asmus Freytag had written:
I have updated my document at http://www.unicode.org/~asmus/what_is_this_character.pdf
...
I welcome [...] any help anyone could provide in identifying the characters
or in locating places they are used.
Lukas Pietsch wrote:
Your F725 Unknown-2, to me, looks
Lukas Pietsch wrote:
Your F725 Unknown-2, to me, looks like a German SCRIPT CAPITAL S,
(compare with U+2112;SCRIPT CAPITAL L). Yes, we were taught to write an
S like this in school. Perhaps it's used somewhere in mathematics?
Looks to me like the proofreader's marginal deletion mark. F7AA might
Hello,
Has anybody of you perfomed an MDMP to Unicode migration in an Oracle database
used as a database for SAP R/3? Any ideas of how feasible/difficult it is or any
information on documentation will be very welcome
Thanks
Andreas
--- Kent Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No fallback rendering is coming into picture with your explanation.
Yes, there is. A character sequence FULL STOP, VOWEL SIGN E (say)
is very unlikely to have a ligature, specially adapted (and fitting)
adjustment points, or similar.
No, with proper reordering (and normal display mode), the e-matra at
the beginning of the second word would appear to be last glyph of the
first word. Similarly, for the second case, the e-matra glyph would
have come to the left of the pa. The fluent reader (ok, not me...)
would
For information on how this is handled on Mac OS, please see:
http://developer.apple.com/fonts/
Deborah Goldsmith
Manager, Fonts Unicode
Apple Computer, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 11:03 AM, John Hudson wrote:
On Windows, the shaping engines for complex scripts
F7C7: A palatalised y is pretty unlikely (it's already palatal). Sure it's
not a palatalised v?
- Peter
---
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Erik Ostermueller asked:
We have a large amount of C++ that currently has Unicode 2.0 support.
Could you all help me figure out what types of operations will fail
if we attempt to pass Unicode 3.0 thru this code?
I can start the list off with
-sorting
-searching for text
This
Please note that the Issues for Public Review have been updated with a new
review item regarding tailoring of normalization. Please see issue number
7 on this page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/
Instructions for discussion and submision of formal comments are provided
on that
--- Kenneth Whistler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This depends greatly on what implementation you did for
sorting and searching, and how it handles unassigned code points
in your Unicode 2.0 code. If the code was designed to be
forward compatible, it should do reasonable things with
unassigned
Folks,
Time to register to get the early bird rates for the conference and
hotel...please find the details
below.
Hope to see you in Prague!
Lisa
Register now! Don't miss out on early bird conference and hotel rates!
From memory, although my memory may be faulty, there are some slight
differences between the animals assigned in the Chinese calendars and
the animals assigned in the Vietnamese calendar.
in the Vietnamese sequence, it is goat. while most chinese sources
indicate sheep (occasionally they say
Rick McGowan rick at unicode dot org wrote:
Please note that the Issues for Public Review have been updated with a
new review item regarding tailoring of normalization. Please see issue
number 7 on this page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/
This is hardly a formal comment, but allowing
Keyur Shroff keyur_shroff at yahoo dot com wrote:
Can you please explain what is the best practice to handle unassigned
code points so that applications can easily become forward compatible?
If we just ignore unassigned code points, then will it make for
application easier to migrate to later
15 matches
Mail list logo
