I'm looking for two mathematical
characters.
1) The canonical one-to-one (injective) mapping;
is this U+21AA ? Looks like it (no annotation though).
2) An angle operator (combining mark ?) looking
like this _| , where
a )
n|
a ) n occurrence
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> It's a great news. It will force websites to stop using Microsoft
> specific features and caveats, and adopt the real standards.
> ...
> If web sites start using the real standards, people will upgrade for
> a more standard browser, and Microsoft will consider correcting
>
At 18:50 -0400 2003-06-15, Steven Shamlian wrote:
"Perhaps the most common Pre-Christian symbol still in use today, is
the round, whirling symbol of eternity. In Armenia it is found
everywhere, in architecture; on doors, walls and on tombstones. It
can also be found as part of various logotypes
How is it used? What does it really mean? Can you show us samples of it in
use in text of various kinds?
The Armenian Eternity symbol is a modernization of an ancient Armenian
petroglyph symbol (can be seen in context here at
http://www.willmaster.com/aviator/M2M/mariam%20hakobyan%20-%20armenia/1
> > that how will browsers perform that are build on non-Unicode
> based OSes?
>
> But surely Mac OSX has been designed to support Unicode ??
> How much longer will we need browsers to run in operating
> environments that are non-Unicode based?
>
> > Let us hope that this drop of support will re
At 07:39 -0700 2003-06-15, Carl W. Brown wrote:
I hope that Apple develops a competitive browser with great Unicode support.
Apple has already done so, though I still like OmniWeb very much. :-)
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
> I disagree with Philippe's message in that I think that it is based on
> Microsoft's determination to follow the idea that browsers are not
> applications but part of the OS.
To clarify my statement.
I think Philippe's message was appropriate to this forum. It was far more
pertinent to Unicode
"Stefan Persson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> I believe that we won't see any MS Office 20003 for another
18000 years.
Whooops... typo.
- Chris
"Philippe Verdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> removing the unnecessary
> features that Microsoft wants to promote, such as proprietary
web fonts for CSS2,
Phillipe
I presume you are talking about "embedded" web fonts - since if
CSS is simply used to get the "best match", using fonts a
Christopher John Fynn wrote:
Since MS Office 20003 seems to be heavily based on XML,
it looks to me like end user applications are in effect becoming
specialised XML browsers / editors.
I believe that we won't see any MS Office 20003 for another 18000 years.
Stefan
"Carl W. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MichKa,
> > This is an equal opportunity forum intended for discussion
of issues
> > relative to Unicode, an industrial consortium that includes
(among many
> > others) the co
11 matches
Mail list logo
