At 00:57 +0200 2003-07-18, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Why is row 03 so resticted? Shouldn't it include those accents and
diacritics that are used by other characters once canonically
decomposed? Or does it imply that MES-2 is only supposed to use
strings if NFC form?
Also, is this list under full c
Although some list members may already be aware of these pages, because
there are still very few web sites today that present text using a
variety of Unicode ranges for purposes other than 'display testing', I
thought the entire list should know about the "Unicode" pages on the Hot
Peach Pages/
On Friday, July 18, 2003 2:18 AM, Kenneth Whistler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MES-2 was not designed by the UTC, nor did it take any of
> these considerations into account. It is not really an
> appropriate construct for the Unicode Standard. A more
> meaningful way to think of it is: if you wan
> > 282 MES-2 is specified by the following ranges of code positions as
> > indicated for each row...
Philippe Verdy asked:
> As most of these characters are canonically decomposable, shouldn't this
> list include also the decomposed characters?
>
> Why is row 03 so resticted? Shouldn't it incl
On Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:23 PM, Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 17:01 +0100 2003-07-17, William Overington wrote:
> > Now, I have never heard of the MES-2 whatever that is. However, I
> > do not have deep knowledge of the various standards which exist.
> > Could you possibly
thank you thank you.
> "Ostermueller, Erik" wrote:
>
> > At unicode.org, when I click this link,
> >
> http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=2
> > I'm expecting to see a little square GIF that
> displays U+2.
> > Instea
"Ostermueller, Erik" wrote:
> At unicode.org, when I click this link,
> http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=2
> I'm expecting to see a little square GIF that displays U+2.
> Instead, I see "N/A".
This has now been fixed. Thank you for pointing out the error. The code
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:01:30PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >http://www.lisa.org/archive_domain/newsletters/2003/
> > >3.2/lommel_unicode.html
> >
> > This link seems to be broken. I get a message *Our apologies*
> > *The page you requested is not available.*
>
> I guess you just have t
At 17:01 +0100 2003-07-17, William Overington wrote:
Michael Everson raises some interesting points.
William.
If CENELEC wishes to standardize a set of icons, they will do so. If
they have a need to interchange data using those icons, they will (if
they are wise) come to us an ask to encode them.
William spilled another ocean of digital ink. Found bobbing
in that ocean was the comment:
> >Roozbeh and I assigned two unencoded characters for Afghanistan to
> >the PUA, and we encourage implementors to use them until such time as
> >the characters are encoded.
>
> Yes. ... Now that at least
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 12:00 AM, Richard Cook wrote:
I'm guessing this just hasn't been implemented yet.
You are guessing correctly. Once some of the dust settles from my day
job, I expect I can get to this.
==
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage
Michael Everson raises some interesting points.
>William.
>
>If CENELEC wishes to standardize a set of icons, they will do so. If
>they have a need to interchange data using those icons, they will (if
>they are wise) come to us an ask to encode them. If they want to use
>the Private Use Area befor
Richard wrote:
> Erik, I think you are correct. The link should be like so:
>
> http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/refglyph?24-2
>
> I'm guessing this just hasn't been implemented yet.
I swear I've seen the glyph on this page before. When I looked at it in the PDF
Hi,
Can any body give me the path/url to get a Char set Detector. which can
detect the char set's encoding scheme ..atleast for shift_jis and big5.
I downloaded from mozilla and build it. It's working fine for UTF8 but
failing for shift_jis and big5 in some cases. I'm working on HP unix. If any
bo
14 matches
Mail list logo
