Does someone know if the intercalary heads of Tai Xuan Jing are
coded in Unicode? If so, which code number were they given?
(The Intercalary heads are used for Dec 21. P.M. and for Feb 29 on leap
years)
P. A,
Hello:
We have the following sequence of characters ...ización Map.. that is
the same than ...izaci#243;n Map... that after suffering some
transformations becomes to ...izaci#56186;56333;ap
AS you can see the two characters 56186 and 56333 seem to represent this
sequences ón M. Any idea?.
pepe pepe schreef:
We have the following sequence of characters ...ización Map..
that is
the same than ...izaci#243;n Map... that after suffering some
transformations becomes to ...izaci#56186;56333;ap
AS you can see the two characters 56186 and 56333 seem to
represent this
sequences
Pim Blokland wrote:
Not only that, but the process making the mistake of thinking it is
UTF-8 also makes the mistake of not generating an error for
encountering malformed byte sequences,
BTW, this process has a name: Internet Explorer.
AND of outputting the result as two 16-bit numbers
Hello:
My knowledge about encoding is very poor and you seem to know a lot abou
this. could you explain a bit more what you have said. I have made the
following:
This is the problematic sequence 0011-01101110-0010-01001101
(F3-6e-20-4d) if I follow the instructions that appaear in
From: Marco Cimarosti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pim Blokland' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Unicode mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pim Blokland wrote:
Not only that, but the process making the mistake of thinking it is
UTF-8 also makes the mistake of not generating an error for
encountering malformed
«That's good for symbolizing e-mail», I said, «but that joint supports
no POP3/SMTP access, only webbrowsing. «You should go for a www
instead...» «Well, I want it as one character only. Any ideas, dummy?»
This dummy then produced U+02AC to the startled friend, and hurried in
search a
From: Kenneth Whistler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's good for symbolizing e-mail, I said, but that joint supports
no POP3/SMTP access, only webbrowsing. You should go for a www
instead... Well, I want it as one character only. Any ideas, dummy?
This dummy then produced U+02AC to the startled
hum a very stupid (but work) way.
1. use vi
2. type #x + the Unicode text + ; for each characters
3. save it as .html
4. open the file by using browser
5. copy the text
6. paste into your software.
--
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
tm rhtt, Itrntinl Dvlpmet, AOL Intrtv
Srvies
AIM:yungfongta
I've looked into the TST thing.
I'm not sure that it is optimal, despite how popular they are!
Look at this, if I add 1, 2,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 to a
TST, they will all be in a line, in the tree. All will be reference via
the high node.
So, to find 9, I have to read through 9 items!
Now, I'm
Philippe Verdy verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
If IE really wants to keep some compatibility, it may only accept the
CESU-8 encoding only as a possible choice for its automatic
selection of charsets, or display a visible replacement character
(such as a narrow white box) for
I just finished reading Linguistic Diversity and National Unity:
Language Ecology in Thailand by William Smalley, University of Chicago
Press, ISBN 0-226-76288/9, and I found it very interesting. However, I
have no reference to judge it against. Can anybody comment on it? Any
significant
We tend to use tries, which have very good performance characteristics. See
bits of unicode on my site: www.macchiato.com.
Mark
__
http://www.macchiato.com
- Original Message -
From: Theodore H. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon,
13 matches
Mail list logo
