Alain LaBont alb at sct1 dot gouv dot qc dot ca wrote:
However IBM PCs did something else, and their groups are limited to 3
levels.
and again:
[Alain] There is no penalty, you can have as many groups as you want.
Do not make a confusion with PC implementations which are limited to 3
À 18:24 2004-07-26, Mike Ayers a écrit:
In less pedantic
terms:
SNIP/
Oddly, that was
the pedantic explanation I sought.
[Alain] Am I supposed to find this nice?
Any national
group is group 1 by definition according to ISO/IEC 9995.
Group 2 is a Latin supplementary group to access
those
À 02:38 2004-07-27, Doug Ewell a écrit:
In what way are PC keyboards necessarily limited to 3 levels? I can
easily construct a PC keyboard layout using MSKLC in which characters
are assigned to Shift+AltGr keystrokes. In fact, the standard
US-International keyboard comes like this.
[Alain] I
I didn't expect this pointless discussion to get that far. Hopefully,
this will be the end of it.
2004-07-19T02:39:47+03:00 Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conclusion:
1) The Republic of Tatarstan passed a law in 1999 and coming into
force in 2001 establishing a Tatar Latin alphabet.
On 27/07/2004 15:21, Alexander Savenkov wrote:
...
I can't guess what is considered by many in Tatarstan. And I think
you shouldn't be guessing too as it makes no difference in our case.
If someone, in spite of the law, consider killing people to be ok,
it's a matter of court.
There is a law
On 2004.07.27, 15:21, Alexander Savenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, Peter, you're going off the topic. You're invited to
prove your assumptions with facts or withdraw them.
I was in Tatarstan in March 2000 (in Kazan and in Nabr. Cheln.) and
most of the (scarce) public usage of the
What's all the fuss, then?
Unicode exists to support what people use. Do people use Latin script
for Tatar? Evidence indicates that they do. Should Unicode support it,
then? Certainly. Does Unicode support it? Yes, Unicode supports the
Latin script, with gobs of extensions. So what's the
Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
Unicode exists to support what people use. Do people use Latin script
for Tatar? Evidence indicates that they do. Should Unicode support
it, then? Certainly. Does Unicode support it? Yes, Unicode supports
the Latin script, with gobs of extensions. So what's the
Eric Muller wrote:
Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
Unicode exists to support what people use. Do people use Latin
script for Tatar? Evidence indicates that they do. Should Unicode
support it, then? Certainly. Does Unicode support it? Yes, Unicode
supports the Latin script, with gobs of
On 27/07/2004 18:21, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
What's all the fuss, then?
Ivan the Terrible conquered (what is now) Tatarstan in 1552. Stalin
imposed the Cyrillic alphabet in 1939. Do the current Russian
authorities want the same reputation? That's why this is a big issue in
Tatarstan.
Barlq
On 27/07/2004 18:29, Eric Muller wrote:
Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
Unicode exists to support what people use. Do people use Latin
script for Tatar? Evidence indicates that they do. Should Unicode
support it, then? Certainly. Does Unicode support it? Yes, Unicode
supports the Latin script,
Title: RE: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows
From: Alain LaBonté [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:59 AM
À 18:24 2004-07-26, Mike Ayers a écrit:
In less pedantic terms:
SNIP/
Oddly, that was the pedantic explanation I sought.
[Alain] Am
The Unicode Technical Committee has posted a new public review issue.
Details are on the following web page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/
Briefly the new issue is:
39 Draft Unicode Technical Standard #31 Identifier and Pattern Syntax
An updated draft of UTS #31 Identifier and
Mike Ayers a crit:
RE: Much better Latin-1 keyboard for Windows
[Alain] As I said in my previous mail, these definitions
are
not the best of definitions. The distinction is but
intuitive, you have to see the diagrams where labeling makes
the difference:
SNIP/
I don't have
14 matches
Mail list logo
