From: Jony Rosenne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Kirk
You mean, you would represent a black e with a red acute accent as
something like e, ZWJ, red, IBC, acute, /red? That
looks like
a nightmare for all kinds of processing and a nightmare for rendering.
No, it is more like forecolor:black,
On 08/09/2004 04:43, Jony Rosenne wrote:
...
You mean, you would represent a black e with a red acute accent as
something like e, ZWJ, red, IBC, acute, /red? That
looks like
a nightmare for all kinds of processing and a nightmare for rendering.
No, it is more like forecolor:black,
The Unicode Technical Committee is pleased to announce the availability of
a new fully-approved version of Unicode Technical Report #17: Character
Encoding Model.
It may be obtained at the following URLs:
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr17/
This report describes a model for the
The Unicode Technical Committee has posted a new issue for public review
and comment. Details are on the following web page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/
Review periods for the new items close on November 8, 2004.
Please see the page for links to discussion and relevant documents.
The Unicode Technical Committee has posted two new issues for public
review and comment. Details are on the following web page:
http://www.unicode.org/review/
Review periods for the new items close on November 8, 2004.
Briefly, the new issues are:
44 Bidi Category of Fullwidth
At 12:49 AM 9/8/2004, Philippe Verdy wrote:
And still no decision if this invisible base character will be added or
not. It's just a public review for now,
Well, hold your horses for a bit here.
If something's out of review, there won't be a decision until the review is
over.
Anything that has
From: Asmus Freytag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:49 AM 9/8/2004, Philippe Verdy wrote:
And still no decision if this invisible base character will be added or
not. It's just a public review for now,
Well, hold your horses for a bit here.
If something's out of review, there won't be a decision until
Title: RE: [BULK] - Re: markup on combining characters
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 2:25 PM
If something's out of review, there won't be a decision until
the review is over.
I'm sorry, but I
At 05:53 PM 9/8/2004, Mike Ayers wrote:
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 2:25 PM
If something's out of review, there won't be a decision until
the review is over.
I'm sorry, but I can't make sense of
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the unknown group.
It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the misleading name.
Jony
Jony Rosenne scripsit:
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the unknown group.
It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the misleading name.
To anticipate Michael: Of course it is. It's not used in the Hebrew
language, perhaps; but the Hebrew script is used for
Jony wrote,
FB1D, HEBREW LETTER YOD WITH HIRIQ, should be assigned to the
unknown group. It is not a Hebrew character, notwithstanding the
misleading name.
Hmmm... Are you claiming that HEBREW LETTER YOD (the base character of the
codepoint U+FB1D) is not a letter of the Hebrew script, and
Philippe Verdy wrote, re Public Review Issue #41:
I don't know if a formal proposal has been sent to ISO/IEC WG too.
Yes. In fact, the PRI document itself says WG2 N2822. It *has* gone to WG2
as well as to UTC.
Rick
13 matches
Mail list logo
