>
> > And it's a pretty easy guess that there are quite a few more users
> with Japanese and Chinese filenames in the same file system than
> users with Latvian and Marshallese filenames in the same file
> system, both because both Chinese and Japanese are used by many more
> people than Latvian
On 3 Jul 2013, at 19:21, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> On 7/3/2013 2:04 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>> On 3 Jul 2013, at 09:52, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>>
>>> Quite a few people might expect their Japanese filenames to appear with a
>>> Japanese font/with Japanese glyph variants, and their Chinese file
On 7/3/2013 2:04 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
On 3 Jul 2013, at 09:52, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
Quite a few people might expect their Japanese filenames to appear with a
Japanese font/with Japanese glyph variants, and their Chinese filenames to
appear with a Chinese font/Chinese glyph variants.
Martin wrote:
>
> Quite a few people might expect their Japanese filenames to appear with a
> Japanese font/with Japanese glyph variants, and their Chinese filenames to
> appear with a Chinese font/Chinese glyph variants. But that's never how this
> was planned, and that's not how it works today.
On 3 Jul 2013, at 09:52, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> Quite a few people might expect their Japanese filenames to appear with a
> Japanese font/with Japanese glyph variants, and their Chinese filenames to
> appear with a Chinese font/Chinese glyph variants. But that's never how this
> was planned,
On 2013/06/22 0:32, Michael Everson wrote:
On 21 Jun 2013, at 16:20, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Yeah, I don't believe that you can language-tag individual file names for such
display as that is markup.
Why do you need to? You only need one language, it is not like file names are
multilingual high
6 matches
Mail list logo
