On 19 August 2015 at 12:36, Otto Stolz otto.st...@uni-konstanz.de wrote:
You cannot suggest a new character just because it would
be “nice to have”. Rather, you have to supply evidence that
an additional character really needs to be encoded, e. g.
because it is already widely used in print
Hello Emma Haneys,
Am 19.08.2015 um 01:20 schrieb Emma Haneys:
i just wondering if i can suggest a new emoji .
hoppefully you can respone to me .
So far, you have only received derisive responses from
the Unicode discussion list. This is because you have
not understood how suggestions for
I'd agree about reading and following
http://unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Selection_Factors.
As far as petitions go, we take them with a sizable grain of salt. See
http://unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Selection_Factors_Requested. In the
particular cases you cite, we had sufficient evidence about
Otto Stolz wrote:
You cannot suggest a new character just because it would be “nice to have”.
Why not?
The UNICORN FACE character has been encoded into regular Unicode following such
a suggestion.
I sent in a suggestion for an OKAPI to be encoded and was informed that my
suggestion would be
I don't think that is the issue. U+FF9E/F are already lb=NS, which prevents
line breaks before. The issue is instead loosening up the lb class for
the halfwidth katakana syllables (from lb=AL to lb=ID), so that they *can*
break the way the regular katakana syllables do.
--Ken
On 8/19/2015 9:21
Mark Davis wrote:
As far as petitions go, we take them with a sizable grain of salt.
Who, exactly, precisely, is we please?
William Overington
19 August 2015
On 19 Aug 2015 at 01:45, Emma Haneys wrote:
i suggest one and only for fruit category . it is a durian .
Emma, at small sizes, and especially in monochrome rendering, the glyph of a
durian emoji would resemble closely to the glyph of an eventual lychee emoji.
You should read also the
Andrew West wrote:
..., and when she has 10,000 signatures make a formal request to the UTC.
Where does the figure of 10,000 for the number of signatures come from please?
That is a lot of people!
What exactly are the rules? Does anybody really know these days!
By comparison it needs ten
On 05/04/2015 02:19 PM, Peter Edberg wrote:
I have been checking with various groups at Apple. The consensus here is that
we would like to see the linebreak value for
halfwidth katakana changed to ID.
Do we want all halfwidth kana changed to ID, or should there
be some exception for the
On 19 Aug 2015 at 20:45, Andrew West wrote:
I don't know, I think durian emoji would be quite distinctive, as
shown in the examples on this page (I am rather taken with the sad
durian which gets no hugs).
What page do you refer to, the hyperlink has got lost, please.
Marcel
On 19 Aug 2015 at 17:18, William_J_G Overington wrote:
Suppose that someone suggests encoding LOCOMOTIVE MALLARD WITH TENDER
LIVERIED AS PRESERVED SEEN IN A DIRECT SIDEWAYS VIEW FROM HER LEFT with a
glyph five times as wide as high.
Do not forget that to be encoded in Unicode, an emoji
On 19 August 2015 at 19:45, Andrew West andrewcw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 19:22, Marcel Schneider charupd...@orange.fr wrote:
On 19 Aug 2015 at 01:45, Emma Haneys miszhan...@gmail.com wrote:
i suggest one and only for fruit category . it is a durian .
Emma, at small sizes,
On 19 August 2015 at 19:22, Marcel Schneider charupd...@orange.fr wrote:
On 19 Aug 2015 at 01:45, Emma Haneys miszhan...@gmail.com wrote:
i suggest one and only for fruit category . it is a durian .
Emma, at small sizes, and especially in monochrome rendering, the glyph of a
durian emoji
On 19 Aug 2015 at 17:18, William_J_G Overington wrote:
I suggest to Emma the contacting of Unicode Inc. using the following form.
http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html
William is right. I strongly recommend you to first use the Contact form, as I
did from the beginning on, long before
On 19 Aug 2015 at 20:48, Andrew West wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 19:45, Andrew West wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 19:22, Marcel Schneider wrote:
On 19 Aug 2015 at 01:45, Emma Haneys wrote:
i suggest one and only for fruit category . it is a durian .
Emma, at small sizes, and
On 19 Aug 2015 at 20:48, Andrew West wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 19:45, Andrew West wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 19:22, Marcel Schneider wrote:
On 19 Aug 2015 at 01:45, Emma Haneys wrote:
i suggest one and only for fruit category . it is a durian .
Emma, at small sizes, and
thanx all for responding . and i 'ved sent the suggestion to the right
place . thanx for info
On Aug 19, 2015 8:55 PM, William_J_G Overington wjgo_10...@btinternet.com
wrote:
Otto Stolz wrote:
You cannot suggest a new character just because it would be “nice to
have”.
Why not?
The
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:51:26 +0200 (CEST)
Marcel Schneider charupd...@orange.fr wrote:
Since yesterday I know a very simple way to get the source code (in
C) of any MSKLC layout.
Is this legal? To me it smacks of reverse engineering, which is
prohibited under the MSKLC licence.
Richard.
And is there an emoji for GRAIN OF SALT? (Actually, that could almost
be useful... or even just a geometric CUBE...)
~mark
On 08/19/2015 01:10 PM, William_J_G Overington wrote:
Mark Davis wrote:
As far as petitions go, we take them with a sizable grain of salt.
Who, exactly, precisely,
19 matches
Mail list logo
