Re: annotations

2016-03-13 Thread Asmus Freytag (t)
On 3/12/2016 10:55 PM, Janusz S. "Bień" wrote: In fact, the possibility of reuse in this context probably among the > unstated rationales for making the information and syntax available in > the first place. I understand there is no intention

Re: annotations (was: NamesList.txt as data source)

2016-03-13 Thread Marcel Schneider
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:03:20 -0600, Doug Ewell wrote: > My point is that of J.S. Choi and Janusz Bień: the problem with > declaring NamesList off-limits is that it does contain information that > is either: > > • not available in any other UCD file, or > • available, but only in comments (like

Re: Proposed Unicode 10.0 emoji U+1F961 Takeout Box

2016-03-13 Thread Doug Ewell
gfb hjjhjh wrote: or alternatively provide selector for the emoji to change it to different style? http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr52/ -- Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 

Re: annotations (was: NamesList.txt as data source)

2016-03-13 Thread Doug Ewell
My point is that of J.S. Choi and Janusz Bień: the problem with declaring NamesList off-limits is that it does contain information that is either: • not available in any other UCD file, or • available, but only in comments (like the MAS mappings), which aren't supposed to be parsed either.

Proposed Unicode 10.0 emoji U+1F961 Takeout Box

2016-03-13 Thread gfb hjjhjh
Its sample glyph and emoji description say oyster pail, which according to Wikipedia it seems to be a mostly American things. Would it be better to create emoji for other takeout boxes like Chinese Ricebox (Not the American style one), Japanese Bento, and pizza box, or alternatively provide

Re: annotations (was: NamesList.txt as data source)

2016-03-13 Thread Marcel Schneider
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 07:55:24 +0100, Janusz S. Bień wrote: > For this purpose he wrote also a converter from NamesList format to XML That goes straight into the direction I suggested past year as a beta feedback item[1], but I never thought that it could be so simple. > I understand there is

Re: Emoji Feminism - The New York Times

2016-03-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:14:33AM -0700, Eric Muller wrote a message of 1 lines which said: > http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/emoji-feminism.html?_r=0 Funny (I love penguins), but the New York Times should read UTR #51, section 2.1

Emoji Feminism - The New York Times

2016-03-13 Thread Eric Muller
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/emoji-feminism.html?_r=0