On 3/12/2016 10:55 PM, Janusz S. "Bień"
wrote:
In fact, the possibility of reuse in this context probably among the
> unstated rationales for making the information and syntax available in
> the first place.
I understand there is no intention
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:03:20 -0600, Doug Ewell wrote:
> My point is that of J.S. Choi and Janusz Bień: the problem with
> declaring NamesList off-limits is that it does contain information that
> is either:
>
> • not available in any other UCD file, or
> • available, but only in comments (like
gfb hjjhjh wrote:
or alternatively provide
selector for the emoji to change it to different style?
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr52/
--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO
My point is that of J.S. Choi and Janusz Bień: the problem with
declaring NamesList off-limits is that it does contain information that
is either:
• not available in any other UCD file, or
• available, but only in comments (like the MAS mappings), which aren't
supposed to be parsed either.
Its sample glyph and emoji description say oyster pail, which according to
Wikipedia it seems to be a mostly American things. Would it be better to
create emoji for other takeout boxes like Chinese Ricebox (Not the American
style one), Japanese Bento, and pizza box, or alternatively provide
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 07:55:24 +0100, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> For this purpose he wrote also a converter from NamesList format to XML
That goes straight into the direction I suggested past year as a beta feedback
item[1], but I never thought that it could be so simple.
> I understand there is
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 08:14:33AM -0700,
Eric Muller wrote
a message of 1 lines which said:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/emoji-feminism.html?_r=0
Funny (I love penguins), but the New York Times should read UTR #51,
section 2.1
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/emoji-feminism.html?_r=0
8 matches
Mail list logo