On 2017/01/07 08:21, Christoph Päper wrote:
I just discovered the WAP Pictogram specification (WAP-213-WAPInterPic), last
published in April 2001 and updated in November 2001.
I haven’t found any reference or vendor-specific images, by the way, and if it
wasn’t just used as an example
I just discovered the WAP Pictogram specification (WAP-213-WAPInterPic), last
published in April 2001 and updated in November 2001.
- http://www.wapforum.org/what/technical.htm (requires OMA credentials)
-
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/affiliates/wap/wap-213-wapinterpic-20010406-a.pdf
Another important point for the modifier letter fallbacks to work (if
supported),
would be that fonts support diacritics combined with modifier small letters.
In 2014 I requested the superscript small 'è' (not noticing that the intended
abbreviation is incorrect), but encoding new characters
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:21:29 -0800, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>
> On 1/5/2017 9:42 PM, Marcel Schneider wrote:
> >
> > Nevertheless,
> > the user might prioritize the stability of the document when it comes to
> > plain text,
> > and he could be interested in a better-looking display of letters
On 1/5/2017 9:42 PM, Marcel Schneider
wrote:
Nevertheless,
the user might prioritize the stability of the document when it comes to plain text,
and he could be interested in a better-looking display of letters that elsewhere
should be superscripted. Here, the
5 matches
Mail list logo