Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

2017-11-09 Thread Philippe Verdy via Unicode
So this is effectively (custom HTML-like markup) "Bäck-ker" 2017-11-10 4:11 GMT+01:00 Asmus Freytag via Unicode : > On 11/9/2017 6:40 PM, Elias Mårtenson via Unicode wrote: > > On 9 November 2017 at 18:12, Walter Tross wrote: > >> Long story short:

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

2017-11-09 Thread Philippe Verdy via Unicode
2017-11-10 3:40 GMT+01:00 Elias Mårtenson via Unicode : > On 9 November 2017 at 18:12, Walter Tross wrote: > >> Long story short: it's Abschlusssatz now (and Rollladen, etc.) One of the >> criteria of the reform was to normalise hyphenation. This has

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

2017-11-09 Thread Asmus Freytag via Unicode
On 11/9/2017 6:40 PM, Elias Mårtenson via Unicode wrote: On 9 November 2017 at 18:12, Walter Tross wrote: Long story short: it's Abschlusssatz now (and

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

2017-11-09 Thread Elias Mårtenson via Unicode
On 9 November 2017 at 18:12, Walter Tross wrote: > Long story short: it's Abschlusssatz now (and Rollladen, etc.) One of the > criteria of the reform was to normalise hyphenation. This has gone so far > as to hyphenate Bä-cker, with the additional criterion of keeping the

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

2017-11-09 Thread Walter Tross via Unicode
Long story short: it's Abschlusssatz now (and Rollladen, etc.) One of the criteria of the reform was to normalise hyphenation. This has gone so far as to hyphenate Bä-cker, with the additional criterion of keeping the c inside its group. 2017-11-09 9:47 GMT+01:00 Elias Mårtenson via Unicode

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

2017-11-09 Thread Elias Mårtenson via Unicode
On 4 July 2017 at 00:49, Werner LEMBERG via Unicode wrote: > > > No, the hyphenation oddity involving the addition of letters with > > hyphenation (or, to be more precise, to suppress letters in > > unhyphenated words) never affected the letter s. > > I'm not sure that this