Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues

2017-12-21 Thread Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:04:37 -0800 > Cc: Unicode Public > From: Manish Goregaokar via Unicode > > However, Firefox deletes by code point. As does Emacs, btw.

Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues

2017-12-21 Thread Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
> When deleting by backspace, the usual practice is to delete one Unicode character for each key press. This seems to depend on the operating system and program involved. For example, on OSX any native text input field (Spotlight, TextEdit, etc) will delete by extended grapheme cluster. Chrome

Re: Inconsistency between UTS 39 and 24

2017-12-21 Thread Philippe Verdy via Unicode
These are ISO 15924 script codes for script variants or groups of related scripts, not used in Unicode classification of characters due to their unification (even if there are registered variants for them) 2017-12-22 1:18 GMT+01:00 Karl Williamson via Unicode : > In

Inconsistency between UTS 39 and 24

2017-12-21 Thread Karl Williamson via Unicode
In http://unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Mixed_Script_Detection it says, "For more information on the Script_Extensions property and Jpan, Kore, and Hanb, see UAX #24" In http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr24/, there certainly is more information on scx; however, none of the terms Jpan Kore nor Hanb

Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues

2017-12-21 Thread Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
On 2017/12/15 07:40, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:45:23 + Cibu Johny (സിബു) wrote: Malayalam could be a similar story. In case of Malayalam, it can be font specific because of the existence of traditional and reformed writing styles. A