I was looking the feedback in http://www.unicode.org/review/pri355/, and
didn't see yours there. Could you please file your feedback there? (Nothing
on this list is tracked by the committee...)
FYI, I'm thinking now that the change should be:
GB9c: (Virama | ZWJ ) × LinkingConsonant
=>
GB9c:
It's probably still too difficult to input a character with umlaut for
general people in 2018, like the official Chinese romanization system used
the character "ü", but because it's so hard to be input or process many
people in many occasion just use "v" instead and more recently standarised
"yu"
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:49:46 +0100
Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> But there's NO standard keyboard in Kazakhstan with the Latin
> alphabet. Those you'll find are cyrillic keyboards with a way to type
> basic Latin. Or keyboards made for other countries.
I believe we're
I don't know if this was discussed, but it'd help
scientists/mathematicians if all Greek and Hebrew were available as
superscript & subscript. Mathematicians use certain such letters in
standard notation of important expressions/formulae (superscript π in
Euler's Identity, subscript base π,
I don't know if this was discussed, but it'd help
scientists/mathematicians if all Greek and Hebrew were available as
superscript & subscript. Mathematicians use certain such letters in
standard notation of important expressions/formulae (superscript π in
Euler's Identity, subscript base π,
But there's NO standard keyboard in Kazakhstan with the Latin alphabet.
Those you'll find are cyrillic keyboards with a way to type basic Latin. Or
keyboards made for other countries.
So this is not a good reason at all. In fact Kazakstan would have to create
a keyboard standard for the Latin
6 matches
Mail list logo