Philippe Verdy wrote:
> I agree, and still you won't necessarily have to press a dead key to
> have these characters, if you map one key where the Cyrillic letter
> was > producing directly the character with its accent. [...]
>
> However, if you can type one key to produce one latin letter with i
My apologies for the typo. There's no excuse for misspelling someone's name
(especially since I live in Switzerland, and type German every day).
Thanks for calling my attention to it: the doc has been updated.
Mark
Mark
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:15 AM, Andrew West via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.
Just a remark for fun:
- You'll also note that this talk is all about the apostrophe, and if
Kazakhstan wants to introduce it in 2019, that year will match exactly the
code point U+2019 [ ’ ]...
- This year 2018 is also the year to discuss and reverse the apostrophe
decision, and it matches the cod
Such example shows that ignoring umlauts makes the document
counterintuitive. Nobody is able to infer that "Paper" refers to a person
here or if he actually meant a paper sheet/article...
At least he should have written "Paeper" which would be more correct (if
"Christoph Päper" is German, the umlau
Philippe Verdy wrote:
So there will be a new administrative jargon in Kazakhstan that people
won't like, and outside the government, they'll continue using their
exiosting keyboards [...]
Newspapers and books will continue for a wihile being published in
Cyrillic [...]
Yes, it will be a mess.
On 23 January 2018 at 00:55, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
>
> Regular American users simply don't type umlauts, period.
Not even the president of the Unicode Consortium when referring to
Christoph Päper:
http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2018/18051-emoji-ad-hoc-resp.pdf
Andrew
6 matches
Mail list logo
