What happened to the previous proposal? As I recall, there was some good
discussion after an email from you back in 2015 <
http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2015-m03/0118.html> and
Michael Everson offered assistance, but no formal proposal has been
submitted to the Documents Register
I just found this assertion in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniscribe:
"Microsoft worked with the Unicode Technical Committee to make shaping
requirements available in a machine readable format, so a complete
definition of each supported script will be included in the Unicode
standard and
On Tue, 15 May 2018 06:04:45 -0800
James Kass via Unicode wrote:
> Display behaviour which is script-specific should be handled by the
> rendering/shaping engine. Only that which is font-specific should be
> handled by the font.
That makes a lot of sense. Unfortunately,
On 5/15/2018 2:46 PM, Markus Scherer via Unicode wrote:
I am proposing the addition of 2 new characters to the Musical
Symbols table:
- the half-flat sign (lowers a note by a quarter tone)
- the half-sharp sign (raises a note by a quarter tone)
In an actual proposal, I
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Johnny Farraj via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Dear Unicode list members,
>
> I wish to get feedback about a new symbol submission proposal.
>
Just to clarify, this is a discussion list where you may get some useful
feedback. This is not where you
On Tue, 15 May 2018 04:19:42 -0800
James Kass via Unicode wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> wrote:
>
> > ... One could argue that the three positions require
> > different glyphs for SIGN U. Each font would
On Tue, 15 May 2018 02:18:11 -0800
James Kass via Unicode wrote:
> Richard Wordingham replied,
>
> >> ...Private Use Area...
> >
> > That's what the Xishuangbanna News does for final consonants.
>
> I failed to find a link for their web site, but only spent about an
> hour
Dear Unicode list members,
I wish to get feedback about a new symbol submission proposal.
Currently the Miscellaneous Symbols table (2600-26FF) includes the
following characters:
266D ♭ MUSIC FLAT SIGN
266F ♯ MUSIC SHARP SIGN
while the Musical Symbols table (1D100 - 1D1FF) includes the
Years ago this mailing list had some wonderful long discussions.
A similar such discussion may be interesting now on the topic of Colours - both
for emoji and otherwise, as recent developments could possibly be leading
towards a major change in Unicode.
A few days - including a weekend -
Display behaviour which is script-specific should be handled by the
rendering/shaping engine. Only that which is font-specific should be
handled by the font.
The font's OpenType tables will include pointers to presentation forms
which aren't directly encoded, the location and repertoire of which
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
wrote:
> ... One could argue that the three positions require
> different glyphs for SIGN U. Each font would need its own PUA.
Or a consensus.
> ... There are several
> places in Tai Tham layout where I
Richard Wordingham replied,
>> ...Private Use Area...
>
> That's what the Xishuangbanna News does for final consonants.
I failed to find a link for their web site, but only spent about an
hour and a half searching for it. There is a web site for
"Xishuangbanna Daily", but the pages I saw there
12 matches
Mail list logo