Re: Could U+E0001 LANGUAGE TAG become undeprecated please? There is a good reason why I ask

On 2/10/20 6:14 PM, Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode wrote: As for "concatenation of such plain text sequences" where each sequence is in a different language, I must again ask: Is there a system that actually does this, that does not have a higher-level protocol that can carry metadata about the

RE: Could U+E0001 LANGUAGE TAG become undeprecated please? There is a good reason why I ask

The examples given don't convince me that "higher-level protocols" would not be sufficient. There are very few messages being sent in the "Internet of Things" that are truly plain-text. Even those that use a text base (as opposed to binary data) are still in some kind of structured computer

Re: Could U+E0001 LANGUAGE TAG become undeprecated please? There is a good reason why I ask

wjgo_10...@btinternet.com via Unicode wrote in <141cecf1.23e.1702ea529c1.webtop@btinternet.com>: |Could U+E0001 LANGUAGE TAG become undeprecated please? There is a good |reason why I ask | |There is a German song, Lorelei, and I searched to find an English |translation. Regarding Rhine

Could U+E0001 LANGUAGE TAG become undeprecated please? There is a good reason why I ask

Hi Could U+E0001 LANGUAGE TAG become undeprecated please? There is a good reason why I ask There is a German song, Lorelei, and I searched to find an English translation. I found the following video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ3JhxOUbw0 The video is an instrumental version and is