RE: [OT?] Modifying (Unicode) sorting of languages using diacritics in MS Word and MS SQL Server

2004-02-22 Thread Chris Pratley
Word uses sort orders provided by the system, so if it is not there, you wouldn't be able to use it. Same with additional language IDs - the system defines a set of languages which Word is using. Windows XP was shipped well before Unicode 4.0 came out, and Word2003 was shipped just after Unicode

RE: Detecting encoding in Plain text

2004-01-08 Thread Chris Pratley
If you are on the Windows platform, look at mlang.dll, and at the IMultiLanguage2 and IMultiLanguage3 APIs, which provide this service. As others have noted you will get false detections with too little or ambiguous data, but you may be quite surprised at just how accurate this detection is

RE: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ?

2003-12-02 Thread Chris Pratley
Title: RE: MS Windows and Unicode 4.0 ? A few corrections to your version of history below +++ Chris Pratley Group Program Manager, Microsoft Word, Publisher, OneNote _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Philippe

RE: UTF-8 and HTML import into MS Word 2000

2003-08-08 Thread Chris Pratley
Did you solve your problem? I opened both of these documents into IE, clicked the Edit in Microsoft Word button for each, and they imported correctly, with the Japanese displaying fine. In the first test file, the last letter of your name at the bottom is not correctly encoded in UTF-8 so it

RE: CJK question

2003-03-23 Thread Chris Pratley
u can use ExtB fonts, such as the one in the Office XP Proofing Tools. Chris From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sun 3/23/2003 12:18 AMTo: Chris PratleyCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: CJK question Chris Pratley wrote, Win2000 can be made to support Ext B characters

RE: CJK question

2003-03-22 Thread Chris Pratley
Win2000 can be made to support ExtB characters. Download the support package at: http://www.microsoft.com/china/windows2000/downloads/18030.asp Office2000 does NOT support Ext B or any Unicode characters above plane 0, but OfficeXP does. The Proofing Tools for Office2000 naturally do not

RE: code points in MS word

2002-12-10 Thread Chris Pratley
If you put the bytes 00 and 41 in the file in that order, and expect LATIN CAPTIAL LETTER A, then that is assuming a text file encoding of UCS-2/UTF-16, and a byte order of MSB first, LSB second. Word calls that encoding Unicode (big-endian). You can use Word2000 or Word2002 to open that file

RE: TrueType signature bits and MS Word

2002-07-17 Thread Chris Pratley
You should always set as much info correctly in the font as you can. What you are seeing are the results of some workarounds we had to implement to handle poorly made fonts. Chris MS Word Sent with Office11 on WindowsXP -Original Message- From: Raymond Mercier [mailto:[EMAIL

Unicode Latin combining diacritics - Looking for real-world example documents

2002-04-01 Thread Chris Pratley
need your help! Thanks in advance, Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP

RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in Windows 98

2002-03-14 Thread Chris Pratley
-Original Message- From: Martin Kochanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: March 14, 2002 00:47 To: Chris Pratley; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in Windows 98 At 21:47 13/03/02 -0800, Chris Pratley wrote: If you're trying to offer users something

RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in Windows 98

2002-03-13 Thread Chris Pratley
PROTECTED]] Sent: March 12, 2002 00:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in Windows 98 At 17:34 11/03/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 03/11/2002 12:58:16 AM Chris Pratley wrote: While it is true that in terms of absolute numbers most apps do not yet support UTF-16

RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in WIndows 98

2002-03-11 Thread Chris Pratley
Durdin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:55 PM To: Vladimir Ivanov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Chris Pratley; Michael Everson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in WIndows 98 At 08:20 PM 9/03/2002 +0300, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: Should we wait for Keyman

RE: Keyboard Layouts for Office XP in WIndows 98

2002-03-08 Thread Chris Pratley
for WM_UNICHAR will have been added to other apps in the Office suite. (Chris Pratley, can you comment on that?) - Peter --- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX

RE: CRLF vs. LF (was Re: Unicode and end users)

2002-02-21 Thread Chris Pratley
A correction on Murray's comment: Note that Word2002 handles all of these types of line breaks (CRLF, LF, CR, and PS) and roundtrips them so that your LF-only text file remains LF after editing. I have to agree that Word is not in the class of system default editors Chris Group Program Manager

RE: Unicode and end users

2002-02-19 Thread Chris Pratley
Perhaps that was true of NT4. On WindowsXP NTFS uses UTF-16 - it handles Extension B filenames just fine. Chris Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP -Original Message- From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 19, 2002 5:04 AM To: David Hopwood Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Unicode and end users

2002-02-19 Thread Chris Pratley
Even better, use Word2002 and get all that, plus the ability to *edit* the file and then save it back in any encoding, controlling CRLF/LF/CR or whatever... Actually, this problem of remembering encoding is not specific to notepad - it happens for any text editor. The issue is that often the

RE: the Unicode range and code page range bits in the TrueType OS/2 table

2002-02-08 Thread Chris Pratley
Microsoft applications use both of these to try to determine if a font is likely to support a certain range. Some fonts do not properly set those values but most do, especially common ones. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Office Sent with OfficeXP on WindowsXP -Original

RE: Windows/Office XP question

2001-10-19 Thread Chris Pratley
The Office system is more like a form of B, maybe B+. When looking for substitute fonts, we actually try to match by font style (Sans serif, etc.). Frankly this is more than enough for what is really a fallback mechanism. FWIW, A sounds nice and I can imagine some niche cases where one might

RE: OCX's that support Unicode

2001-10-19 Thread Chris Pratley
Um, best to check the license agreement in Project. Sorry, I have little to do with them. Sent with OfficeXP final release -Original Message- From: Tex Texin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: October 18, 2001 11:23 PM To: Chris Pratley Cc: Michael (michka) Kaplan; Unicoders; NE

RE: microsoft font link

2001-08-07 Thread Chris Pratley
is far more expensive than typical fonts) Thanks, Chris Sent with OfficeXP final release -Original Message- From: Mike Lischke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 4, 2001 7:31 AM To: Chris Pratley; Magda Danish (Unicode); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: microsoft font link The font

RE: Unicode/font questions.

2001-08-01 Thread Chris Pratley
as fast or faster than non-Unicode processing. Chris Pratley Grpoup Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with OfficeXP final release -Original Message- From: Murray Sargent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 1, 2001 9:13 AM To: Richard, Francois M; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: microsoft font link

2001-07-31 Thread Chris Pratley
The font Arial Unicode MS is not free for download. You must be a licensed user of an Office Family product from the 2000 or XP generation. If you have Office2000 or OfficeXp, Arial Unicode MS comes on the CD of the product. If you have Publisher2000, you can go to http://office.microsoft.com and

RE: Wordprocessors in Korean

2001-07-16 Thread Chris Pratley
-Original Message- From: Seuk Soo Sung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 16, 2001 6:04 AM To: Chris Pratley; Jungshik Shin Cc: Unicode Mailing List Subject: RE: Wordprocessors in Korean First of all, sorry for long mail. If you are not interesting Korean Wordprocessor, please stop here

RE: Cicero and TSF(was RE: Wordprocessors in Korean)

2001-07-16 Thread Chris Pratley
-Original Message- From: Jungshik Shin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 16, 2001 7:30 PM To: Chris Pratley Cc: Seuk Soo Sung; Unicode Mailing List Subject: Cicero and TSF(was RE: Wordprocessors in Korean) On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Chris Pratley wrote: From: Seuk Soo Sung [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Wordprocessors in Korean

2001-07-14 Thread Chris Pratley
not really understand the complexities of the arguments involved since they seem mainly philosophical and very passionate. BTW, do you have any details on what you described as limitations for Word in Korean word processing? Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent using OfficeXP

RE: Wordprocessors in Korean

2001-07-13 Thread Chris Pratley
for the last 6 years, I know how much Word has improved in that area, so I am sure that at least some of the complaints have been addressed. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with OfficeXP final release -Original Message- From: Jungshik Shin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Erratum in Unicode book

2001-07-11 Thread Chris Pratley
. (and sometimes earlier, often to their and others' significant detriment :-)) Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with OfficeXP final release -Original Message- From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: July 9, 2001 12:26 PM To: Unicode List Subject: Re

RE: Word and Version 3.1 characters

2001-04-02 Thread Chris Pratley
or SP2 release of Office2000. If you have that and are still seeing the problem, then the problem did not get fixed. If you have just the initial release version, try installing SR1. Word2002 (from OfficeXP) handles surrogates correctly. Word2002 also handles Alt-x directly in the document. Chris

RE: Unicode market acceptance

2001-03-20 Thread Chris Pratley
port for "surrogates", display, editing, etc. What's not to like? :) Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:43 AM To: Unicode List Subject: RE: Unicode market acceptan

RE: Myanmar Script (1000-109F)

2000-10-20 Thread Chris Pratley
This font looks like a classic latin-1 hack font. The upper and lowercase Latin glyphs have been switched for Burmese. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with Office10 2216 wordmail on -Original Message- From: John Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: October

RE: A binary that runs on Win9X and WinNT

2000-10-11 Thread Chris Pratley
The Office team does not make the solution we developed internally for our own applications available publicly for several reasons: 1. It takes time to extract the code 2. Its priority is always low since it does not help Office 3. The application teams are not in the business of Win32 developer

RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?

2000-10-03 Thread Chris Pratley
Surrogate support was not turned on by default in Win2000 because the Windows team was waiting for the standard to be finalized. It was also added late, so to reduce the potential impact they had it off - a safe bet since the standard was still 1+ years from completion. Chris Sent with office10

RE: [OT] Word select in Microsoft products?

2000-10-03 Thread Chris Pratley
se past the ends of both words, then backing up. I never would have guessed the behavior, but it seems to work. Thanks! Mark - Original Message - From: Chris Pratley To: 'Mark Davis' ; Unicode List Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 13:12 Subject: RE: [OT] Word select in Microsoft products

RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?

2000-10-03 Thread Chris Pratley
-Original Message- From: Jeff Hay-Roe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: October 3, 2000 1:52 PM To: Unicode List Subject: RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc? Chris Pratley wrote: Surrogate support was not turned on by default in Win2000 because the Windows team was waiting

RE: [OT] Word select in Microsoft produ

2000-10-02 Thread Chris Pratley
. Word handles the spacing between words so I just type. Sorry I can’t help you with the other products Mark. Maybe someone else knows… Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with office10 2125 -Original Message- From: Mark Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Can anyone help me!!!

2000-09-26 Thread Chris Pratley
e enough time to get the Thai/Indic in the global release, that's all. That's why Peter's comparison works the way it does now, and won't work that way next year when Word10 is available. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word Sent with Office10 build 2118 wordmail on -Original Messa

RE: Converter for BIG5

2000-09-07 Thread Chris Pratley
then save as any encoding by doing File/Save As/Encoded text. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word -Original Message- From: viswanathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:26 PM To: Unicode List Subject: Converter for BIG5 Hello

RE: Windows 2000 Chinese IME

2000-08-03 Thread Chris Pratley
I assume there is a typo below, and that you mean when you type ma2, you want only choices that are ma2, and not ma3, mashang, etc. When I use MS Pinyin 2.0 IME on Win2000, I get exactly 4 candidates when I input ma2: (U+9ebb) (U+5417) (U+87c6) (U+8534). Each of these is pronounced

RE: Arial Unicode MS

2000-08-02 Thread Chris Pratley
You need to install NT4 SP5 or later to fix this. Sent with Office2000 SR1 wordmail -Original Message- From: Dara Becker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:45 PM To: Unicode List Subject: Arial Unicode MS Does anybody else have problems with Arial Unicode MS

RE: Unicode and CJK unification

2000-08-02 Thread Chris Pratley
Arial Unicode MS uses CJK glyphs from various cultural styles, so if you need a pure font, you would be better off using a font that specifically targets a particular locale e.g. MingliU for Traditional Chinese, and Simsun for Simplified Chinese. Both of these come with Office2000.

RE: Designing a multilingual web site

2000-07-19 Thread Chris Pratley
This makes sense if you realize that characters are just bytes, and you can play around with the interpretation of the bytes as much as you like until one interpretation works. Data in Unicode, however, breaks the (rough) rule that bytes can be interpreted as any codepage. (note that this is a

RE: Designing a multilingual web site

2000-07-19 Thread Chris Pratley
This makes sense if you realize that characters are just bytes, and you can play around with the interpretation of the bytes as much as you like until one interpretation works. Data in Unicode, however, breaks the (rough) rule that bytes can be interpreted as any codepage. (note that this is a

RE: Mixing languages on a Web site

2000-07-03 Thread Chris Pratley
, etc.). There is almost no documentation in English on how to use IMEs that I know of. The Office2000 Proofing Tools manual has one page for each language, but comprehensive documentation in English does not exist that I know of (I would love to be proven wrong). Chris Pratley Group Program Manager

RE: Twinbridge Word 2000

2000-06-27 Thread Chris Pratley
applet, then in Word got to Tools/Options/General/English Word 6.0/95 documents contain, and select Chinese. In PowerPoint, go to Tools/Options/Asian/Convert font-associated text) Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word -Original Message- From: Magda Danish (Unicode

RE: Unicode and Indic scripts on Windows (was: Re: FAQ : princip

2000-06-20 Thread Chris Pratley
Small note: All language flavours of Win2000 include the Indic support and input methods Chris describes, not just the one shipped in India. Chris Pratley Group Program Manager Microsoft Word -Original Message- From: Christopher John Fynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: June 18, 2000 4