/reporting.html.
Thank you, I'll file a report.
--
Best regards,
Chris Weber - ch...@lookout.net - http://www.lookout.net
PGP: F18B 2F5D ED81 B30C 58F8 3E49 3D21 FD57 F04B BCF7
period.
I understand that registries don't have t bundle/block if they don't
want to, but protecting their customers is advised.
-Chris
On 6/28/2011 11:20 PM, Peter Krefting wrote:
Den 2011-06-29 04:41:22 skrev Chris Weber ch...@lookout.net:
I was trying to understand the implementation
On 6/29/2011 4:12 PM, Neil Harris wrote:
Firefox currently has an open bug for IDNA 2008 implementation:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479520
-- Neil
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Nice of DENIC to give a... ahem... 3
week sunrise period. I hope nobody was on vacation!
On 6/28/2011 11:20 PM, Peter Krefting wrote:
Den 2011-06-29 04:41:22 skrev Chris Weber ch...@lookout.net:
I was trying to understand the implementation differences in some
browsers and registrars. Using your example from UTS46
http://xn--fa-hia.de/
Opera - error, doesn't resolve
We have
On a tangent, under IDNA2003 rules, shouldn't registration and
resolution of the punycode form of "faß.de", which is
"xn--fa-hia.de" be illegal since the nameprep process would mapp the
eszett to "ss"?
On 6/27/2011 4:14 PM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
Once the
--a.
Mark
— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 14:40,
Chris Weber ch...@lookout.net
wrote:
On a tangent
6 matches
Mail list logo
