Re: Bidi paragraph direction in terminal emulators

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, 18:39 Egmont Koblinger via Unicode On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 2:57 AM Richard Wordingham via Unicode > wrote: > > > Which side do you align RTL cells on? > > It's out of the scope of my docs. > > In the current work-in-progress implementation I align them to the > left, but

Re: Bidi paragraph direction in terminal emulators

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 00:09 Eli Zaretskii via Unicode > Moreover, emitting the control sequences that set the mode is in > itself a complication, because if the terminal doesn't support them, > the result could be corrupted display. You will need methods of > detecting the support, and those

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

On 9 November 2017 at 18:12, Walter Tross wrote: > Long story short: it's Abschlusssatz now (and Rollladen, etc.) One of the > criteria of the reform was to normalise hyphenation. This has gone so far > as to hyphenate Bä-cker, with the additional criterion of keeping the

Re: Aw: Re: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S officially recognized

On 4 July 2017 at 00:49, Werner LEMBERG via Unicode wrote: > > > No, the hyphenation oddity involving the addition of letters with > > hyphenation (or, to be more precise, to suppress letters in > > unhyphenated words) never affected the letter s. > > I'm not sure that this

Re: PETSCII mapping?

more thinking (they are all horizontal and vertical lines at > various positions within the character cell; naming depends on if we want > to unify some of them with the HORIZONTAL SCAN LINEs in the Miscellaneous > Technical block). > > > > > > > > -- Rebecca Bettencourt

Re: PETSCII mapping?

On 6 April 2017 at 11:32, Rebecca Bettencourt wrote: We do have to provide Unicode with fonts, I believe. We can use an existing > C64 font, such as Pet Me. Or, we can create a new font with vectorized > versions of the characters. > Are there any existing C64 fonts with

Re: PETSCII mapping?

On 6 April 2017 at 09:44, James Kass wrote: > Rebecca Bettencourt wrote, > > > I can put together a unified chart, with mappings to Unicode where > > they exist. In fact I think I'll do that. :) > > I hope you do. That would be a good starting point. > The Wikipedia

PETSCII mapping?

I have been searching, trying to find some information as to why there is a large set of symbols in PETSCII which cannot be mapped to Unicode. PETSCII is the character set used by the Commodore 64, which was an incredibly popular computer in the 80's, and still remains in use to this day. More

Re: Character folding in text editors

On 21 February 2016 at 06:10, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote: Unicode, even CLDR, doesn't nearly have enough data for the purpose. > (and as a corollary of what Elias points out, it's likely to annoy users > of every language, in that it would fold essential and non-essential >

Character folding in text editors

Hello Unicode, I have been involved in a rather long discussion on the Emacs-devel mailing list[1] concerning the right way to do character folding and we've reached a point where input from Unicode experts would be welcome. The problem is the implementation of equivalence when searching for