Re: Will TAGALOG LETTER RA, currently in the pipeline, be in the next version of Unicode?

> 3. Even when 13 comes out, fonts won't be immediately and magically > updated to include them. In this case, though, several fonts actually already include TAGALOG LETTER RA. :) "This spot, U+170D, has become a *de facto* standard among *baybayin* writers in the Philippines and the Filipino

Re: Unicode "no-op" Character?

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > Security gateways filter it out completely, as a matter of best practice > and security-in-depth. > > > > A process, let’s call it Process W, adds a bunch of U+000F to a string it > received, or built, or

Re: Encoding italic

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 6:23 AM Richard Wordingham via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 04:52:30 -0800 > David Starner via Unicode wrote: > > > Note that this is actually the only thing that stands out to me in > > Unicode not supporting older character sets; in PETSCII

Re: Encoding italic

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:58 AM David Starner via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 3:59 AM Kent Karlsson via Unicode < > unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > >> >> Den 2019-02-08 21:53, skrev "Doug Ewell via Unicode" > >: >> > • Reverse on: ESC [7m >> > • Reverse off: ESC

Re: Encoding italic

+∞ -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 12:55 PM Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote: > I'd like to propose encoding italics and similar display attributes in > plain text using the following stateful mechanism: > > • Italics on: ESC [3m > • Italics off: ESC [23m

Re: Teletext graphics characters

. -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:02 AM William_J_G Overington via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > In the minutes of the recent meeting of the Unicode Technical Committee, > document http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2018/18272.htm there is the following. >

Re: UCD in XML or in CSV? (is: UCD in YAML)

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:20 AM Philippe Verdy via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > That version has been announced in the Windows 10 Hub several weeks ago. > And it only took them 33 years. :)

Re: Private Use areas

> > > That sounds like a non-conformant use of characters in the U+24xx block. > > Well, you are an expert on these things and I do not understand as to with > what it would be non-conformant. > > A conformant process must interpret ⓅⓊⒶⒹⒶⓉⒶ as the characters ⓅⓊⒶⒹⒶⓉⒶ and not as a signal to process

Re: Private Use areas

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:10 AM, Janusz S. Bień wrote: > > I already provide this myself for my uses of the PUA as well as the > > CSUR and any vendor-specific agreements I can find: > > > > http://www.kreativekorp.com/charset/PUADATA/ > > I would prefer to see the data in a repository, so

Re: Private Use areas

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:02 PM Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote: > Ken Whistler wrote: > > > The way forward for folks who want to do this kind thing is: > > > > 1. Define a *protocol* for reliable interchange of custom character > > property information about PUA code points. > > I've often

Re: Private Use areas

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Janusz S. Bień via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > I think PUA users should provide the > properties of the characters used in a form analogical to the Unicode > itself, and the software should be able to use this additional > information. > I already

Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:53 PM, James Kass via Unicode wrote: > Blissymbolics, as pointed out > by Leo Broukhis, might be good candidates for "emojification". > Why don't we just get Blissymbolics encoded as it is?

Re: CSUR and UCSUR glyphs

-niwatori/nishiki-teki.htm> that includes a lot of CSUR and UCSUR scripts, and a version of GNU Unifont <http://unifoundry.com/unifont.html> that does as well. Beyond that, I know as much as you do. -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Michael Bear via Unicode < unico

Re: PETSCII mapping?

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > Michael Everson wrote: > > > Everybody interested, raise your hand… > > I'm in. I'm in as well of course. > Rebecca Bettencourt wrote: > > > The question is, do we want to a

Re: PETSCII mapping?

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Michael Everson wrote: > At some point this should be taken off the main list since discussion will > get very detailed very quickly. > I agree. How should we get all the interested parties together?

Re: PETSCII mapping?

, but what do I know. -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Rebecca T <637...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here’s a copy of the Teletext character set; it includes box-drawing > characters > for all combinations of a 2×3 grid of cells. 2⁶ = 64 characters, so we > might

Re: PETSCII mapping?

on if we want to unify some of them with the HORIZONTAL SCAN LINEs in the Miscellaneous Technical block). -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2017 at 11:32, Rebecca Bettencourt <beckie...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: PETSCII mapping?

On 6 April 2017 at 09:44, James Kass <jameskass...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rebecca Bettencourt wrote, > > > I can put together a unified chart, with mappings to Unicode where > > they exist. In fact I think I'll do that. :) > > I hope you do. That would be a good

Re: PETSCII mapping?

*From:* Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] * On Behalf Of *Rebecca > Bettencourt > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:42 AM > *To:* Asmus Freytag <asm...@ix.netcom.com> > *Cc:* unicode <unicode@unicode.org> > *Subject:* Re: PETSCII mapping? > > > > O

Re: PETSCII mapping?

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Asmus Freytag wrote: > Unicode is not an archive of anything ever used on computers. > Why not? Isn't one of Unicode's goals to support the conversion of documents using legacy character sets into Unicode? I do not understand why, say, the

Re: Unicode Emoji 5.0 characters now final

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Christoph Päper < christoph.pae...@crissov.de> wrote: > If I made an open-source emoji font that contained flags for all of the > 5000ish > ISO 3166-2 codes that actually map to one, would I automatically be > considered a > vendor? Do I need to have to pay

Re: Is this the oldest d20 on Earth?

(lowercase). So yes, all 20 symbols are known and encoded. -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Richard Cook rsc...@wenlin.com wrote: On Sep 20, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Jonathan Coxhead jonat...@doves.demon.co.uk wrote: Here's an icosahedral dice from the Ptolemaic period

Re: Nosy: Emoji Mr Potato Head font

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi olopie...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Magnus Bodin ☀ mag...@bodin.org wrote: There is a red button stating DOWNLOAD NOSY with white letters. Yes, and it opens a popup which says it costs 0$ and asks for a credit card.

Re: Re: Do you know a tool to decode UTF-8 twice

Jörg, by any chance would this do what you need? http://www.kreativekorp.com/software/recode/#reinterpret -- Rebecca Bettencourt On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Buck Golemon b...@yelp.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Jörg Knappen jknap...@web.de wrote: Hi Steffen, data