On Tue, 17/7/18, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> Subject: Re: UAX #9: applicability of higher-level protocols to bidi plaintext
> To: unicode@unicode.org
> Date: Tuesday, 17 July, 2018, 3:30 AM
> An interesting ambiguity is "!True" v. "True!
it is not clear whether you are quoting from some agreed standard, quoting from
some other authority, or constructing a classification of your own
whatever the classification, it should be descriptive, and it is best not to be
too pedantic, because practice can vary from region to region, from i
OK, he's no technocrat, but try googling "tony blair kazakhstan"
and in case anybody's wondering what Nazarbayev got for his five million
pounds,
for a partial explanation, check out
https://www.rt.com/uk/340035-blair-strike-kazakhstan-massacre/
it is not known if Blair profferred any ad
. . . and do Russians still do mathematics?
I guess not, since there is no Cyrillic counterpart to the AMS extensions
also, chemists sometimes like to put a superscript over a subscript
will that still have to be done using rich text?
or maybe we need another extension . . . ?
/phil
--
4 matches
Mail list logo
