Re: [even more OT] Re: the Ethnologue

2000-09-17 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
From: "John Cowan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Besides I can not take any standard that implements i-klingon as a human language too seriously. Why not? Human beings speak it (some more fluently than others), and write texts in it. Just follow the links from www.kli.org. It is not anybody's

Re: [even more OT] Re: the Ethnologue

2000-09-17 Thread Doug Ewell
Michael Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't forget to use 1554 (0x0612) if you need a Windows LCID for Klingon - Latin and 2578 (0x0A12) for Klingon - pIqaD. There's nothing more powerful than a user defined area. :-) This is, at once, the best argument for and the best argument against