At 10:35 AM 6/14/00 -0800, you wrote:
At 09:57 AM 06/13/2000 -0800, Otto Stolz wrote:
Off-topic
Am 2000-06-13 um 17:49 h hat Alain geschrieben:
[Having pictograms everywhere] is much lighter than having to provide
indications, say, in 12 languages (most common example: toilets).
Watch out
Pictograms are problematic because they are often culturally based.
How about using the ideographs we already have, ie the Unified Han
Characters? Totally culturally-BASED, I suppose, but knowing fewer than 20
of them I was nonetheless able to locate the ladies room, find the exit, and
figure
At 09:57 AM 06/13/2000 -0800, Otto Stolz wrote:
Off-topic
Am 2000-06-13 um 17:49 h hat Alain geschrieben:
[Having pictograms everywhere] is much lighter than having to provide
indications, say, in 12 languages (most common example: toilets).
Watch out when you go to the bathroom in
At 07:29 AM 06/13/2000 -0800, Alain wrote:
With more than 2 languages, precedence becomes problematic. As an example
of language precedence, an actual case: at the Toronto Airport Radisson
Suite Hotels, my prefered hotel in Toronto (so far! but it could
change...), they recently introduced a
4 matches
Mail list logo
