Am 2000-07-11 um 00:05 h UCT hat Erik van der Poel geschrieben:
Or the document.write can be removed from TR22, but I don't know whether
that workaround is acceptable to the authors.
Or, the construct
prelt;?xml version=quot;1.0quot; ...?gt;
lt;!DOCTYPE characterMapping
SYSTEMÂ
Thanks to Netscapers Katsuhiko Momoi and Erik van der Poel for helping
untangle this for me.
It turns out that there is a bug in Navigator 4.06 that operates as Erik
described. So the problem is Netscape's, but OTOH it *is* related to
the use of Javascript in TR's which I originally questioned.
FYI, I am using Windows 95 (revision B), Netscape Navigator 4.06, and
printing to an HP LaserJet 4M Plus.
snip
Can the authors (or reformatters) of Unicode Technical Reports please
keep the use of "fancy" HTML and Javascript in TR's to a minimum?
Tables and simple stylesheets ought to be
Doug's point is well taken. It's been the editorial committee's policy to
make sure that TR's can be accessed from a wide variety of browsers. If
limiting the range of formatting that is to be used in TR's makes a real
difference to people in the implementers community, then that is something
4 matches
Mail list logo
