Mr. Cook,
Thank you for all the information (and bringin Wenlin to my attention as well).
Where a specific value attested in a specific Kangxi edition is missing from
kRSUnicode, it would indeed be useful to add it,
Great to hear that.
Since kRSUnicode is a Normative property, a formal
On Mar 12, 2014, at 2:59 AM, Adam Nohejl wrote:
Since kRSUnicode is a Normative property, a formal proposal to modify that
data is required, for review in WG2. I have added notes on the items you
mention below, for consideration in that process, and in the meantime, if
you identify any
Mr. Nohejl,
About the property data you mention below. kRSUnicode property data permits
multiple/variant (space-delimited) radical/stroke values, and I think we will
see important variants added in the future. Where a specific value attested in
a specific Kangxi edition is missing from
I don't know about the points you raise, but I wish it was easier to help
proofread Unihan data. Back in 2012 I compared kKangXi to kIRGKangXI and
found 252 conflicts, besides the cases where a character only has one or
the other. I even put together a simple tool to help fixing this, with
links
Hello,
I am comparing radical data for CJK characters from different sources,
including the Unihan database. According to the Unihan documentation* the
kRSUnicode radical should correspond to kRSKangXi radical, which in turn should
be based on the Kang Xi dictionary.
Is there any explanation
5 matches
Mail list logo
