On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:55:23 + (GMT)
William_J_G Overington wrote:
> Richard Wordingham wrote:
>
> > 'Foreground' and 'background' are the only externally defined
> > colours. There's no ability to explicitly choose, say 'text stroked
> > sable and dotted gules'.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:04:34 +0100
Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> On the opposite, colored in Arabic or hieroglyph texts is a a useful
> emphasize and sometimes semantically significant (some rare old
> scripts also used dictinctive colors): we are in a case similar to
I'm not speaking about hieroglyphs, even if they are perfectly readable in
monochrome on monuments.
I was just saying that colorful **emojis** are just a nuisance and colors
in them do not add any semantic value (except possibly flags, skin tones
were added only to avoid a never-ending battle on
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:28:14 +0100
Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> I even hope that there will be a setting in all browsers, OS'es,
> mobiles, and apps to refuse any colorful rendering, and just render
> them as monochromatic symbols. In summary, COMPLETETY DISABLE the
>
4 matches
Mail list logo