Asmus Freytag wrote (2001-10-17):
>
> Even with a number of errata not yet corrected, the current font is a vast
> improvement over the previously used TTF font (which did not contain any
> glyphs at all for several hundred positions). In the meantime, John said
> it all when he wrote the the id
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 09:16 AM, Thomas Chan wrote:
> That works for those that have a character set source mapping (e.g., T-
> sources for higher CNS 11643 planes) or dictionary source page and
> serial
> number mappings (e.g., kHanyuDaZidian field), but what do we do about
> those
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> Even with a number of errata not yet corrected, the current font is a vast
> improvement over the previously used TTF font (which did not contain any
> glyphs at all for several hundred positions). In the meantime, John said
> it all when he wrote the t
At 02:30 PM 10/17/01 -0700, James Kass wrote:
>Richard Cook wrote:
>
> > Aha! I was looking at a bound version of 10646-2-2000-12-05 (SC2/WG2
> > N2309) in which the forms are not identical, but betray the variation
> > which causes the codepoints to be separate. It seems that the font
> > vendor
Richard Cook wrote:
> Aha! I was looking at a bound version of 10646-2-2000-12-05 (SC2/WG2
> N2309) in which the forms are not identical, but betray the variation
> which causes the codepoints to be separate. It seems that the font
> vendor has done some unification here ...
OK, still have a pr
Richard Cook wrote:
> >
> > > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs
> > > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical?
> > >
> [U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather
> close) graphical variants. If you want to ID all graphical variants,
> yo
James Kass wrote:
>
> Richard Cook wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs
> > > > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical?
> > > >
> > [U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather
> > close) graphical variants. If you wa
> On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 08:00 PM, James Kass wrote:
>
> > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs
> > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical?
> >
[U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather
close) graphical variants. If you want to
Asmus Freytag wrote:
> We've finally been able to obtain better fonts for the new characters in
> CJK-Extension B. The PDF chart is at
> http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2.pdf.
>
Thank you for the new chart!
Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs
at U+29FD7 an
We've finally been able to obtain better fonts for the new characters in
CJK-Extension B. The PDF chart is at
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2.pdf.
Enjoy.
A./
PS: Fair warning: the complete PDF file is 13MB and contains only the glyph
and code point, no other information about the ch
10 matches
Mail list logo