Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-26 Thread James Kass
Asmus Freytag wrote (2001-10-17): > > Even with a number of errata not yet corrected, the current font is a vast > improvement over the previously used TTF font (which did not contain any > glyphs at all for several hundred positions). In the meantime, John said > it all when he wrote the the id

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-24 Thread John H. Jenkins
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 09:16 AM, Thomas Chan wrote: > That works for those that have a character set source mapping (e.g., T- > sources for higher CNS 11643 planes) or dictionary source page and > serial > number mappings (e.g., kHanyuDaZidian field), but what do we do about > those

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-24 Thread Thomas Chan
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Asmus Freytag wrote: > Even with a number of errata not yet corrected, the current font is a vast > improvement over the previously used TTF font (which did not contain any > glyphs at all for several hundred positions). In the meantime, John said > it all when he wrote the t

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-22 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 02:30 PM 10/17/01 -0700, James Kass wrote: >Richard Cook wrote: > > > Aha! I was looking at a bound version of 10646-2-2000-12-05 (SC2/WG2 > > N2309) in which the forms are not identical, but betray the variation > > which causes the codepoints to be separate. It seems that the font > > vendor

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-17 Thread James Kass
Richard Cook wrote: > Aha! I was looking at a bound version of 10646-2-2000-12-05 (SC2/WG2 > N2309) in which the forms are not identical, but betray the variation > which causes the codepoints to be separate. It seems that the font > vendor has done some unification here ... OK, still have a pr

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-17 Thread James Kass
Richard Cook wrote: > > > > > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs > > > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical? > > > > [U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather > close) graphical variants. If you want to ID all graphical variants, > yo

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-17 Thread Richard Cook
James Kass wrote: > > Richard Cook wrote: > > > > > > > > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs > > > > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical? > > > > > > [U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather > > close) graphical variants. If you wa

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-17 Thread Richard Cook
> On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 08:00 PM, James Kass wrote: > > > Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs > > at U+29FD7 and U+29FCE being identical? > > [U+29FD7] and [U+29FCE] are not identical. They are (admittedly rather close) graphical variants. If you want to

Re: Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-16 Thread James Kass
Asmus Freytag wrote: > We've finally been able to obtain better fonts for the new characters in > CJK-Extension B. The PDF chart is at > http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2.pdf. > Thank you for the new chart! Are there any instructions for reporting errata such as the glyphs at U+29FD7 an

Ext-B fonts updated

2001-10-13 Thread Asmus Freytag
We've finally been able to obtain better fonts for the new characters in CJK-Extension B. The PDF chart is at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2.pdf. Enjoy. A./ PS: Fair warning: the complete PDF file is 13MB and contains only the glyph and code point, no other information about the ch