At 08:45 -0800 2001-02-23, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote:
>From: "Dan Kolis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well
>> have to include anything.
>
>Last I saw, no one was going to encode Klingon.
Oh, we've got a *proposal* for Kling
At 8:27 AM -0800 2/23/01, Dan Kolis wrote:
>Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well
>have to include anything.
>
Klingon is not likely to be encoded any time soon. The basic problem
here is that the Klingon Language Institute has shown little interest
in prom
From: "Dan Kolis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well
> have to include anything.
Last I saw, no one was going to encode Klingon.
So would the converse of that statement be true?
> Interesting discussion, however.
"Interesting" is o
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:58:06PM -0800, Thomas Chan wrote:
>> > First, there are the 4000 new[4] "CJK Ideographs" that he created solely
>> > for a work called _Tianshu_ (A Book from the Sky)[5] (1987-1991), which Xu
>> > spent three years carving movable wooden type for. There is no doubt t
4 matches
Mail list logo