Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now

2001-02-24 Thread Michael Everson
At 08:45 -0800 2001-02-23, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote: >From: "Dan Kolis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well >> have to include anything. > >Last I saw, no one was going to encode Klingon. Oh, we've got a *proposal* for Kling

Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now

2001-02-23 Thread John H. Jenkins
At 8:27 AM -0800 2/23/01, Dan Kolis wrote: >Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well >have to include anything. > Klingon is not likely to be encoded any time soon. The basic problem here is that the Klingon Language Institute has shown little interest in prom

Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now

2001-02-23 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
From: "Dan Kolis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well > have to include anything. Last I saw, no one was going to encode Klingon. So would the converse of that statement be true? > Interesting discussion, however. "Interesting" is o

Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now

2001-02-23 Thread Dan Kolis
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:58:06PM -0800, Thomas Chan wrote: >> > First, there are the 4000 new[4] "CJK Ideographs" that he created solely >> > for a work called _Tianshu_ (A Book from the Sky)[5] (1987-1991), which Xu >> > spent three years carving movable wooden type for. There is no doubt t