RE: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Michael Kaplan (Trigeminal Inc.)
is case is hiding the differences. Michael > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 2:27 PM > To: Michael Kaplan (Trigeminal Inc.) > Cc: Unicode List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Java

RE: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Joe_Ross
; on 06/23/2000 10:41:39 AM To: Unicode List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Ross/Tivoli Systems@Tivoli Systems cc: Hossein Kushki@IBMCA Subject: RE: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases Microsoft is very COM-based for its actual data access methods and COM uses BSTRs that are BOM-less UTF-16

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Joe_Ross
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hossein Kushki@IBMCA, Vladimir Dvorkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steven Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases Joe, Can you expand on this a bit more? Privately if you prefer. Do you mean version 7 of MS SQL Server? I a

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Tex Texin
ersions at > all. > > Michael > > > -- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 7:55 AM > > To: Unicode List > > Cc: Unicode List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Java, S

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Tex Texin
06:42:20 PM > > To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Joe Ross/Tivoli > Systems) > Subject: Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases > > Jianping responded: > > > > >

RE: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Michael Kaplan (Trigeminal Inc.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 7:55 AM > To: Unicode List > Cc: Unicode List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases > > > > I think that this is also true for DB2 using UTF-8 as the database > encoding. >

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Joe_Ross
on 06/22/2000 06:42:20 PM To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Joe Ross/Tivoli Systems) Subject: Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases Jianping responded: > > Tex, > > Oracle doesn'

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-23 Thread Tex Texin
Addison, thanks for this. Good points. I am sure if we bear down on it, there can be many more than 2 problems. JDBC driver differences will be a third. We went thru similar issues programming for double-byte databases a few years back. At least with Unicode, we are doing this for the last time. ;

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-22 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Jianping responded: > > Tex, > > Oracle doesn't have special requirement for datatype in JDBC driver if you use UTF8 >as database > character set. In this case, all the text datatype in JDBC will support Unicode data. > The same thing is, of course, true for Sybase databases using UTF-8 at t

Re: Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-22 Thread Jianping Yang
Tex, Oracle doesn't have special requirement for datatype in JDBC driver if you use UTF8 as database character set. In this case, all the text datatype in JDBC will support Unicode data. Regards, Jianping. Tex Texin wrote: > I want to write an application in Java that will store information >

Java, SQL, Unicode and Databases

2000-06-22 Thread Tex Texin
I want to write an application in Java that will store information in a database using Unicode. Ideally the application will run with any database that supports Unicode. One would presume that the JDBC driver would take care of any differences between databases so my application could be independe