Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
MAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:25 AM Subject: Klingon? take a look Regarding "Klingon"... There was doubt as to the reality of this submission. At http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm Is this proposal, pointed to from a table at: http:/

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Michael Everson
At 09:03 -0800 2001-02-26, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote: Nobody doubted the reality of the submission, we all know it is there. No one is really pushing for it, though. It was originally made because there was a Unix or Linux implementation somewhere. It has been seen and approved by the

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Nick NICHOLAS
Oh, and http://www.klingonska.org/piqad/ . Sorry. -- Nick Nicholas. TLG, UCI, USA. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis Many among their proselytes had sold their lands and houses to increase the public riches of the sect --- at the expense, indeed, of their unfortunate children,

Re: Klingon? take a look

2001-02-26 Thread Nick NICHOLAS
qaStaHvIS Mon, 26 Feb 2001 DIS, ghItlh Michael Everson: implementation somewhere. It has been seen and approved by the Klingon Language Institute, but it does remain true that most users of the Klingon language read and write it in its Latin orthography, although they will use the font for