Asmus wrote:
The reason is, of course, because these codes would *reinterpret*
existing characters. You could argue that Variation Selectors do the
same, but they are carefully constructed so that they can be safely
ignored.
Variation selectors don't change the interpretation of characters,
On 7/17/2011 12:19 PM, Doug Ewell wrote:
Asmus wrote:
The reason is, of course, because these codes would *reinterpret* existing
characters. You could argue that Variation Selectors do the same, but they are
carefully constructed so that they can be safely ignored.
Variation selectors
On 7/15/2011 10:48 PM, Doug Ewell wrote:
I apologize for the unintended content-free post. It's my phone's fault.
--
My dog ate the homework - 2011?
:)
A./
--
Doug Ewell • d...@ewellic.org
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com
Sender: unicode-bou...@unicode.org
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:37:40
To: Michael Eversonever...@evertype.com; Unicode Mailing
Listunicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Quick
I apologize for the unintended content-free post. It's my phone's fault.
--
Doug Ewell • d...@ewellic.org
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
5 matches
Mail list logo