Re: RE: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 09:54 AM 5/7/01 -0700, Rick McGowan wrote: >Now, Word2000 or some other product, or some specific set of fonts may not >be what a classicist wants, but that limitation is not because the width >of many characters are somehow CONSTRAINED by the East Asian Width >property. While that is true, an

Re: RE: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread Rick McGowan
Marco Cimarosti wrote: > East Asian Width is a property that tells whether or not each Unicode > character should have the same typographical width as a CJK ideograph. The > property may be "yes", "no", or a few different kinds of "maybe". Whoa, wait... Whether or not you care at all about the E

RE: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread Thomas Chan
On Sun, 6 May 2001, David J. Perry wrote: > In classical studies, characters with the shape of U+3008/09, 300A-300F, > 3016/17, and 301A/1B are sometimes used to mark various kinds of editorial > uncertainty or conjecture in a text. The first and last pairs in my list > are the most common by fa

RE: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread Marco Cimarosti
David Starner wrote: > However, if I understand the property right, it's designed to > be used in > mono-/bi-width situations like terminal emulators, not in a > proportional > situation like Microsoft Word. The width of the character in > Word should > be dependent on the width of the glyph i

Re: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread From Net Link
On Sun, 6 May 2001 19:22:38 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Chan wrote: #On Sun, 6 May 2001, David J. Perry wrote: # #> Word 2000 (under Win98) insists on using Arial Unicode MS whenever you #> insert a character in the CJK Punctuation range. There are some characters #> here that might be useful in non-CJK

Re: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread David Starner
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:15:39AM +0200, Marco Cimarosti wrote: > Apart this, I see one problem with your idea of using characters from the > "CJK Symbols and Punctuation" block in classical studies: most of these > character have an inappropriate "East Asian Width" property. > > East Asian Widt

RE: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-07 Thread Marco Cimarosti
David J. Perry wrote: > Word 2000 (under Win98) insists on using Arial Unicode MS whenever you > insert a character in the CJK Punctuation range. There are some > characters here that might be useful in non-CJK situations, such as > the double brackets. I have made a font with these characters b

RE: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-06 Thread David J. Perry
In classical studies, characters with the shape of U+3008/09, 300A-300F, 3016/17, and 301A/1B are sometimes used to mark various kinds of editorial uncertainty or conjecture in a text. The first and last pairs in my list are the most common by far (I know 3008/09 has another version somewhere in

Re: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-06 Thread Thomas Chan
On Sun, 6 May 2001, David J. Perry wrote: > Word 2000 (under Win98) insists on using Arial Unicode MS whenever you > insert a character in the CJK Punctuation range. There are some characters > here that might be useful in non-CJK situations, such as the double > brackets. I have made a font wi

Re: Word, Asian characters, and Arial Unicode

2001-05-06 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
From: "David J. Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I've tried several methods of inputting the > characters but the result is always the same. > Does anybody know how to handle this? I believe Word is going with the font choices you will find in the style dialog for the given styles for "Asian langua