On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Andrew West wrote:
Unless you can show evidence that C1 control pictures are currently in
use and that there is a clear demand from the user community to
On Aug 21, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
Perhaps it would help for you to do a quick survey of
Hi Ken et. al.,
On Aug 17, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Ken Whistler wrote:
Further comments:
On 8/13/2011 10:48 AM, Sean Leonard wrote:
In accordance with this and other text in the Standard, it is not really
possible to assign glyphs uniformly and interchangeably to the code points
in
Perhaps it would help for you to do a quick survey of applications that
already make use of the existing C0 control pictures, and include the
results in your argument. That might help convince some of us who feel
the C0 pictures are only there for compatibility with previous character
On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Sean Leonard wrote:
Greetings--hi all, I'm a new poster. I read on the unicode.org website that a
good way to gauge interest and get a proposal through the process is to
gather feedback and comments here before investing the time in a formal
proposal, so, here
On 08/17/2011 05:14 PM, Sean Leonard wrote:
Just putting a*bump* on this post. Any feedback, or, shall I go
directly to a formal proposal? [Original proposal is in the last
e-mail so I am not resending the whole thing.]
Is that all the proposal? You realize you'll have to give sample glyphs,
Sean Leonard lists plus unicode at seantek dot com wrote:
Just putting a *bump* on this post.
Speaking as an individual with personal opinions, and without a vote in
UTC or WG2 (but having followed Unicode for 18 years), I don't see the
need for these additional symbols.
The C0 pictures in the
In general, I agree with Doug Ewell's assessment. I don't see a convincing
case here for the need to encode more control picture characters for C1
controls. There seems to be a confusion here between the need for
glyphs and the need for characters. Also, this would seem to me to
be a receding
On 13 August 2011 18:48, Sean Leonard lists+unic...@seantek.com wrote:
The Unicode code points U+ through U+00FF share the equivalent values
from the ASCII Standard, ISO 646, ISO 6429, and ISO 8859-1. In many contexts,
it is desirable to display all of these code points/characters
8 matches
Mail list logo
