- Message d'origine -
De : "Lukas Pietsch" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Andries enquired:
2) U+1D1C0 seems to have an incorrect names (e.g. "fusa black"). This is
character (SEMIBREVIS BLACK + STEM + FLAG-2)
I believe, this is black SEMI-FUSA. [snip]
I believe the confusion
All notes could have been given post-1420 names given the fact that the
white notes appear only after 1420...
Well, not really, because there are quite a few symbols (black notes of
semibreve and above) which occur only in the pre-1420 notation. So the
series of "black" note names would have a
- Message d'origine -
De : "Lukas Pietsch" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All notes could have been given post-1420 names given the fact that the
white notes appear only after 1420...
Well, not really, because there are quite a few symbols (black notes of
semibreve and above) which occur only
In my last posting I wrote:
I also notice that the "black maxima" seems to be missing. Since we
have the "black" and "white" series, we ought to have them both
complete, right? "black longa" can be thougt of as unified with
Gregorian 1d1d3 "virga", and "black brevis" with generic
1d147
I have a few questions about the Renaissance
musical symbols found inits proposed 3.1 block.
1) I do not see why the notes U+1D1B6-U+1D1C0 are
divided in three different groups, one of them grouping miscellaneous
symbols.
2) U+1D1C0 seems to havean incorrect names
(e.g. "fusa black").
Quick tangential correction to that table that Patrick Andries supplied a
link to: it seems to imply that the Greek accents were musical notation;
they were not. For ancient Greek musical notation see M.L. West, *Ancient
Greek Music*, pp. 254-276, especially the table on p. 256.
Patrick Rourke
6 matches
Mail list logo
