hard Wordingham via Unicode
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 4:27 PM
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Tamil Brahmi Short Mid Vowels
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:42:57 +
Andrew Glass via Unicode wrote:
Thank you Richard and Shriramana for bringing up this interesting
problem.
ode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Tamil Brahmi Short Mid Vowels
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:42:57 +
Andrew Glass via Unicode wrote:
> Thank you Richard and Shriramana for bringing up this interesting
> problem.
>
> I agree we need to fix this. I don’t want to fix this with a font hack
> or
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:42:57 +
Andrew Glass via Unicode wrote:
> Thank you Richard and Shriramana for bringing up this interesting
> problem.
>
> I agree we need to fix this. I don’t want to fix this with a font
> hack or change to USE cluster rules or properties. I think the right
> place t
virama, Tamil Brahmi Puḷḷi, is the right approach.
Cheers,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Unicode On Behalf Of Richard Wordingham via
Unicode
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2018 12:50 AM
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Tamil Brahmi Short Mid Vowels
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 07:55:51
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 07:55:51 +0530
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
> This is a unique problem because this is probably the only case where
> the same script produces conjuncts for one language and not for
> another.
There are and have been similar cases. Reformed (a.k.a. 'typewriter')
Mala
This is a unique problem because this is probably the only case where the
same script produces conjuncts for one language and not for another. I had
asked for a separate Tamil Brahmi virama to be encoded which would obviate
this problem but that was shot down. Maybe that case should be reopened?
O
A problem has been spotted with the rendering of Tamil Brahmi vowels -
in particular the sequence does not conform to the grammar
of the Universal Shaping Engine (USE); a dotted circle may be inserted
between the vowel and the pulli.
When considering font-level remedies, I realised that there may
7 matches
Mail list logo
