Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-25 Thread Barry Caplan
At 10:08 PM 7/24/2002 -0700, Doug Ewell wrote: >Tex Texin wrote: > >> Hall? >> Check? >> Re- ? >> Water? > >No, too late. John Hudson already won this round, for finding a way to >bring it back on topic. (Turns to John and bows, Pat Morita style.) >Congratulations, master. And for that we giv

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread Tex Texin
Everyone prostrate and all together "We are not worthy"... Doug Ewell wrote: > > Tex Texin wrote: > > > Hall? > > Check? > > Re- ? > > Water? > > No, too late. John Hudson already won this round, for finding a way to > bring it back on topic. (Turns to John and bows, Pat Morita style.) > C

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread James Kass
Marion Gunn wrote, > You might enjoy a favourite of mine: _The HH Guide to the Galaxy_ > (the 4th bk of the trilogy, specifically). Any series of books which begins with the complete destruction of Earth is bound to be amusing, eh? Best regards, James Kass.

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread Doug Ewell
Tex Texin wrote: > Hall? > Check? > Re- ? > Water? No, too late. John Hudson already won this round, for finding a way to bring it back on topic. (Turns to John and bows, Pat Morita style.) Congratulations, master. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread James E. Agenbroad
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Tex Texin wrote: > > > John Hudson wrote: > > > > At 08:41 AM 24-07-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > from:Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > subject: Re: The standard disclaimer > > > &

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread Tex Texin
John Hudson wrote: > > At 08:41 AM 24-07-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > from:Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > subject: Re: The standard disclaimer > > > > > > James Kass wrote: > > > > > > >> .

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread John Hudson
At 08:41 AM 24-07-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > from:Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > subject: Re: The standard disclaimer > > > > James Kass wrote: > > > > >> However, just as > > >> no trinities have fourth perso

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread Marion Gunn
Arsa Doug Ewell: > > James Kass wrote: > > >> However, just as > >> no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding) > > > > What about Gummo? (Or,... Karl? or... Deutsche ?) > > Stretch? > > -Doug You might enjoy a favourite of mine: _The HH Guide to the Galaxy_ (the 4

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread john . colby
> from:Doug Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > subject: Re: The standard disclaimer > > James Kass wrote: > > >> However, just as > >> no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding) > > > > What about Gummo? (Or,... Karl? or... Deutsche ?) > > Stretch? > Skid?? John >

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread Doug Ewell
James Kass wrote: >> However, just as >> no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding) > > What about Gummo? (Or,... Karl? or... Deutsche ?) Stretch? -Doug

Re: The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread James Kass
John Cowan wrote, > However, just as > no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding) What about Gummo? (Or,... Karl? or... Deutsche ?) Best regards, James Kass.

The standard disclaimer

2002-07-24 Thread John Cowan
1) I wish to go on record, once and for all, that any postings of mine to this (or any other) mailing list represent my own opinion and not that of my employer or employers either past, present, or future, or any other person natural or juridical, except by a happy coincidence. The ema