Re: What I meant by furigana codes

2000-07-02 Thread John Hudson
At 02:37 PM 7/1/00 -0800, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote: Well, its not entirely fair to say that Furigana is another way of saying Ruby in OpenType, since Furigana predates OpenType entirely, as well as the HTML/DHTML RUBY element. They do provide the same functionality though... Furigana is

Re: What I meant by furigana codes

2000-07-02 Thread Christopher John Fynn
"John Hudson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... In any case, Furigana is definitely what Adobe had in mind when they registered the ruby feature, as is evident from the feature description. Is this OT ruby feature to be applied when e.g. a ruby/ruby tag is encountered in HTML / XML? Or is this

Re: What I meant by furigana codes

2000-07-01 Thread Robert Brady
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furigana codes would simply mark certain text as furigana, meaning to the text-display device, "These characters are not to be displayed on the main line of text, but rather above it and in smaller type". There ought to be furi kana="" and

RE: What I meant by furigana codes

2000-07-01 Thread Alistair Vining
Furigana codes would simply mark certain text as furigana, meaning to the text-display device, "These characters are not to be displayed on the main line of text, but rather above it and in smaller type". There ought to be furi kana="" and /furi codes, or the equivalent, in HTML; at

Re: What I meant by furigana codes

2000-07-01 Thread John Hudson
At 04:04 AM 7/1/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furigana codes would simply mark certain text as furigana, meaning to the text-display device, "These characters are not to be displayed on the main line of text, but rather above it and in smaller type". There ought to be furi kana="" and