For Java, the support for supplementary characters is actually better than one might
think.
It is true that the char type and the Character class only support 16-bit code units.
However, storing UTF-16 strings in String objects and char[] arrays and passing code
points as int's in non-JDK
PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Addison Phillips [wM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:31 PM
To: Yung-Fong Tang
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: surrogate at java's property file
No fair! You forgot to quote my disclaimer in the next email for my big
boo-boo regarding what
has been adopted. It should be interesting.
Best Regards,
Addison
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Carl W. Brown
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:37 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: surrogate at java's property file
Addison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Yung-Fong Tang wrote:
Any one know how does Java handle Surrogate pair property file ?
Java's property file use the \u encoding for non ASCII characters,
therefore U+00a5 is \u00A5. I wonder anyone know how does it handle
Surrogate Pair?
Does U+1
Any one know how does Java handle Surrogate pair property file ?
Java's property file use the \u encoding for non ASCII characters,
therefore U+00a5 is \u00A5. I wonder anyone know how does it handle
Surrogate Pair?
Does U+1 (0xd800 0xdc00) encoded as \u1 or \ud800\udc00 ? (I
think
)
-
Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Yung-Fong Tang
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: surrogate at java's property file
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:24 PM
To: Yung-Fong Tang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: surrogate at java's property file
Java doesn't define any characters beyond Unicode 2.1.8 at the moment. It's
stuck in a time-warp. JDK 1.4 will update to Unicode 3.0... neither
7 matches
Mail list logo