Re: Joined "ti" coded as "Ɵ" in PDF

2016-03-20 Thread Don Osborn
Thanks Leonardo, that is my initial observation. And it has implications for web searches. And there's more. Apparently this is one of a number of such substitutions, which taken together begin to look like the old pre-Unicode hacks of 8-bit fonts. And I found some of them via web search in

Re: Joined "ti" coded as "Ɵ" in PDF

2016-03-20 Thread Janusz S. Bien
Quote/Cytat - Andrew Cunningham (Sun 20 Mar 2016 12:06:29 AM CET): Hi Don, Latin is fine if you keep to simple well made fonts and avoid using more sophisticated typographic features available in some fonts. Dumb it down typographically and it works fine. PDF,

Joined "ti" coded as "Ɵ" in PDF

2016-03-20 Thread Andrew Cunningham
Janusz, It is all smoke and mirrors. For English you have to choose the roght font. Simple, no advanced features disable advanced typographic features in application if you can. Ensure the cmap table in the font is sufficiently comprehensive The issues Don raise still exist in

Re: Purpose of and rationale behind Go Markers U+2686 to U+2689

2016-03-20 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 15/03/2016 22:21, Andrew West a écrit : Possibly. I certainly have very little expectation that a proposal to complete both sets to 999 (or even 399) would have any chance of success. And then, there are also the historical example of ideographic numbers used for the same purpose in

Re: Swapcase for Titlecase characters

2016-03-20 Thread Doug Ewell
Otto Stolz wrote: [ ... ] I'd imagine that users just type the two characters [IJ or ij] separately, and that consequently most data in the real world is like that. For "IJ", cf. . I can't make Edge or Acrobat Reader DC jump to

Re: Swapcase for Titlecase characters

2016-03-20 Thread Otto Stolz
Hello, Am 19.03.2016 um 17:40 schrieb Doug Ewell: As one anecdote (which is even less like "data" than two anecdotes), I could not find any of the characters IJ ij DŽ Dž dž LJ Lj lj NJ Nj nj or their hex equivalents in any of the CLDR keyboard definitions. I'd imagine that users just type the two

Re: Joined "ti" coded as "O" in PDF

2016-03-20 Thread Tom Gewecke
> On Mar 20, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Asmus Freytag (t) > wrote: > > Usually, the archive feature pertains only to the fact that you can reproduce > the final form, not to being able to get at the correct source (plain text > backbone) for the document. My understanding

Re: Joined "ti" coded as "O" in PDF

2016-03-20 Thread Asmus Freytag (t)
On 3/20/2016 12:11 AM, Janusz S. Bien wrote: Quote/Cytat - Andrew Cunningham (Sun 20 Mar 2016 12:06:29 AM CET): Hi Don, Latin is fine if you keep to simple well made fonts and avoid using