On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:05:35 +
Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> I'm still trying to work out what to do for IAST. Is it just:
>
> sa-t-m0-iast
>
> if one finds that
>
> sa-Latn
>
> allows too much latitude?
For material that is a transcription rather than a transliteration, are
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:48 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:05:35 +
> Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
The text in IAST that I encounter seems not to have ansuvara before
> stop consonants.
That's typical.
Whatever the source
I think the 'Latn' in sa-Latn-t-sa-m0-iast is unnecessary, though it
partly depends on the range of the IAST transform. If the
transformation can only convert to the Roman script then 'Latn' is
superfluous; I'm not sure if the extension is formally enough to rule
out Devanagari. On the other
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:07 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
>
> However, as a locale for generated text, I feel it is inadequate.
> Wouldn't the expansion rules generate saṃti from संति rather than santi
> from सन्ति for 'they are'?
True. I suppose that someone
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:35:14 +0530
विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki) via Unicode
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:48 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
> unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:05:35 +
> > Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> The text in IAST that I
5 matches
Mail list logo
