Is the use of the existing precomposed characters in the Latin
Extended-A block considered 'right' for encoding Latvian palatal
consonants, or is it considered 'wrong' so that I will have to use
composites with U+0326 'Combining comma below' in stead?
I am aware that many use those percomposed
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Herman Ranes wrote:
Is the use of the existing precomposed characters in the Latin
Extended-A block considered 'right' for encoding Latvian palatal
consonants, or is it considered 'wrong' so that I will have to use
composites with U+0326 'Combining comma below' in stead?
One of the main features of XML is that it has quite strict rules about how
to handle errors. The goal, I believe, is to ensure that we are not awash in
malformed files that have no clear interpretation.
And this is clearly an error: the acceptable code points are quite clearly
stated:
hi,
can't i use unicode to generate and show the fonts in any browser
irrespective of their support to unicode!. like by writing plugin or
something like this. and when a user with browser which doesn't support
unicode like to access that webpage. he/she needs to install that plugin.
Hi,
Writing a plugin would not be enough. There are quite a few issues
to deal with when rendering Indian text in a browser without
Unicode support (as you all know). I assume that you are looking for
a solution that works for more than just one browser on one platform!?
Some browser may
Hi,
I would like to modify existing C application so that it supports
unicode.
Does anybody know any references any samples that would help?
Thanks.
SoHee
Preliminary character charts are now available for those characters that
are proposed to go into Unicode 3.2 (and into AMD1 to ISO/IEC
10646-1:2000). The majority of the proposed characters are mathematical
symbols and arrows.
The new URL is:
http://www.unicode.org/charts/draftunicode32/
There are a few options, depending what you mean by "supports unicode". If
all you care about the code page conversion so your program can process
Unicode code points, glibc is freely available on many platforms,
http://www.gnu.org.
If your application requires more sophisticated Unicode
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Helena Shih wrote:
There are a few options, depending what you mean by "supports unicode". If
all you care about the code page conversion so your program can process
Unicode code points, glibc is freely available on many platforms,
http://www.gnu.org.
I'm afraid this
My apology, I didn't realize glibc also supports Unicode collation
algorithm. If so, yes, my statement underestimated the support in glibc
quite a bit.
Sorry.
- Original Message -
I'm afraid this is a little bit of understatement fow what glibc can do
(among other things, glibc can
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, do they have a table that says "This hangul syllable
is made up of components X, Y, and Z"?) Maybe Unicode
should have one.
Well, Unicode will never have one for dynamic glyph composition of Hangul
syllables ;-) because there are so many
SoHee,
See
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/icu/project/index.html
This has a library of Unicode C APIs. Most of the docs are for the C++ APIs
but if you look at the user guide
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/icu/project/userguide/
index.html you can
12 matches
Mail list logo