On 7/3/2011 6:31 AM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Regarfing the previous comment about the Danish aa,
Sorry, most of that discussion missed the mark.
Modern Danish can have AA for two reasons. Accidental occurrence, as
in dataanalyse which is composed of two words which just happens to
put two A
2011-07-06 9:25, Asmus Freytag wrote:
Because accidental digraphs (in Danish) happen at word boundaries in a
compound, the SHY is an elegant way to mark them.
It may often be a practical trick, given the current repertoire of
characters in Unicode and the way they are handled in different
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Philippe Verdy wrote:
Even MS Word 2010 continues to use U+001F as soft hyphen
but does not recognize U+00AD as soft hyphen.
I've not spoken at all about U+001F and not even tested it
alt+0031
alt+0173
I have entered TRUE soft hyphens as U+00AD, in a plain-text
On 7/6/2011 12:16 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
Allowing word division just to say that some characters do not
constitute a digraph (or trigraph…) is not practical e.g. when the
text has otherwise no word divisions, for one reason or another, or
when the particular word division point is
On 7/6/2011 11:18 AM, Asmus Freytag wrote:
The Danes, over a decade ago, when they made the official
recommendation to use SHY appear to have come to the conclusion that
AA can never occur accidentally, except at word division in compounds.
Not really a safe conclusion. :)
I wouldn't be adverse to adding [:cn:][:cs:][:co:] to [:gcb:control:]. It
would make it align more with the current definition of Grapheme_Base.
As to how to handle private use characters, UAX #29 already allows
overriding:
This specification defines *default* mechanisms; more sophisticated
Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:04, Karl Williamson pub...@khwilliamson.comwrote:
On 06/08/2011 03:33 PM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
As to the first, it would seem reasonable. The simple folding is not
covered by the following stability policies:
On 7/6/2011 1:40 PM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
The other two are special cases; they casefold together
because of the
way that the full case mapping is computed. Their equivalence is
normally captured by a canonical-equivalent folding. Because
the simple
8 matches
Mail list logo
