On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 17:59:57 -0800
Roozbeh Pournader via Unicode wrote:
> They are actually allowed on combining marks of ccc=0. We even define
> one such variation sequence for Myanmar, IIRC.
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 2:12 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
> unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
>
>
They are actually allowed on combining marks of ccc=0. We even define one
such variation sequence for Myanmar, IIRC.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 2:12 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> Why are variation selectors not allowed for combining marks? I can see
> a reason for
Why are variation selectors not allowed for combining marks? I can see
a reason for them not being allowed on characters with non-zero
canonical combining classes, but not for them being prohibited for
combining marks that are starters, i.e. have ccc=0.
Richard.
3 matches
Mail list logo