Re: Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)

I think Blissymbols could be a separate, well-defined script in Unicode because they are already more or less well defined by their respective groups. This community of interest can lobby for these implementations as a whole instead of multiple individuals separately. Emoji were born in quite a

Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process

due to a lack of communication and ambitions on the part of the ESC. Julian 盧 On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:26 PM Andre Schappo via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > > On 10 Aug 2018, at 21:33, Julian Wels via Unicode > wrote: > > Cultural Iconography > An

Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process

I followed up on the name Charlotte Buff in association with Unicode and found many documents already describing what I said in my original mail. Multiple times in the document registry, together with tons of other helpful suggestions on how to make Emoji better. However, none of these suggestions

Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process

James Kass wrote, > Like, is there a semantic > difference between PICTURE OF SQUIRREL vs. PICTURE OF CHIPMUNK or > BASEBALL vs. SOFTBALL or AUSTALOPITHECINE RIDING THREE-LEGGED HORSE > vs. AUSTALOPITHECINE WITH MOHAWK RIDING THREE-LEGGED HORSE, and so > forth. Yeah they should deal with those

Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process

Hi there! In light of the recently featured 179 proposed Emoji Draft Candidates for Emoji 12.0, I'd like to ask if the selection factors for future emojis shouldn't be more restrictive or rather just enforced more strongly. Extreme