Re: Unicode 3.1: UTF-8

2001-02-01 Thread Mark Davis
ednesday, January 31, 2001 11:18 Subject: Unicode 3.1: UTF-8 I propose that the distinction between illegal and irregular UTF-8 code sequences (D36bc) be eliminated. Since there are no code points between U+D7FF and U+E000 (the apparently intervening code points are UTF-16 code units, but not

Unicode 3.1: UTF-8

2001-01-31 Thread John Cowan
I propose that the distinction between illegal and irregular UTF-8 code sequences (D36bc) be eliminated. Since there are no code points between U+D7FF and U+E000 (the apparently intervening code points are UTF-16 code units, but not Unicode code points) the corresponding UTF-8 code sequences

Re: Unicode 3.1: UTF-8

2001-01-31 Thread David Starner
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:18:37AM -0800, John Cowan wrote: I propose that the distinction between illegal and irregular UTF-8 code sequences (D36bc) be eliminated. Since there are no code points between U+D7FF and U+E000 (the apparently intervening code points are UTF-16 code units, but not