> Message du 13/06/18 22:25 > De : "via Unicode" > A : charupd...@orange.fr > Copie à : > Objet : Your message to Unicode awaits moderator approval > > Your mail to 'Unicode' with the subject > > Re: The Unicode Standard and ISO > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Post to moderated list > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel > this posting, please visit the following URL: > > http://unicode.org/mailman/confirm/unicode/07224dbb3f89488430be25c396d1590baa55c022 > I’m unable to decide whether I should cancel this myself or do nothing. If there is no use in posting, the better. Anyway I’ve nothing more to tell on any list, as UTC isn’t interested in fixing the bidi legibility issue I’ve pointed out, and won’t probably be interested in deprecating U+2010 for not misleading font designers. Additionally some people post false allegations at my expense and start getting insultant, confusing Unicode Public with a WG2 meeting in the nineties, despite of all that having been discussed off-list past year.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:49:10 +0200, Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode wrote: […] > People interested in this topic should > (a) start up their own project somewhere else, > (b) take discussion of it off this list, > (c) never bring it up again on this list. Thank you for letting us know. I apologize for my e-mailing. I didn’t respond in the wake for a variety of reasons while immediately fully agreeing, of course as I had mainly wondered why I got no feedback when I’d lastly terminated a thread turning likewise, but no matter anymore. No problem, as far as it belongs to me, this topic will never be read again here nor elsewhere. Sorry again. Best regards, Marcel
