Asmus Freytag wrote:
> Philippe,
> thank you for your earnest efforts at explaining away a joke.
> I'm sure I'm speaking for the assembled congregation in applauding you for
> your tireless energy in setting the record straight.
Well, as Asmus is purporting to speak
Albrecht,
See TUS, Section 18.3, Bopomofo, p. 707:
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode10.0.0/ch18.pdf#G22553
--Ken
On 8/24/2017 12:19 AM, Dreiheller, Albrecht via Unicode wrote:
Hello Chinese experts,
The Letter I in the Bopomofo alphabet (U+3127)has a two rendering
variants, a
Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
cannot handle SMP characters.
One example being systems that use mysql utf8 (3 byte encoding) and have not
yet updated to utf8mb4 (4 byte encoding)
So, I consider it important to familiarise students with SMP characters
I came across this School Unicode exercise
https://community.computingatschool.org.uk/resources/4546 The exercise concerns
Emoji but to me the important point is that the schoolchildren are having to
think about SMP characters. I do not know if schools gives an explanation of
the BMP and SMP
So how do you think it matters if the characters are in the BMP or SMP?
2017-08-24 19:17 GMT+02:00 Andre Schappo via Unicode :
>
> Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
> cannot handle SMP characters.
>
> One example being systems that use mysql utf8 (3 byte encoding) and have
> not yet updated to utf8mb4 (4
2017-08-17 22:37 GMT+02:00 Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org>:
> Thus, at the level of undisputable text, in Indic scripts there appears
> to be no provision for the ordering of multiple left matras that are
> to be stored in logical order (i.e. backing order) after the onset
>
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:17:10 +
Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
> So, I consider it important to familiarise students with SMP
> characters as well as BMP characters. Then when they develop software
> they will, at the start, be thinking beyond ASCII and Unicode BMP
>
On 8/24/2017 10:17 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
cannot handle SMP characters.
One example being systems that use mysql utf8 (3 byte encoding) and have not
yet updated to utf8mb4 (4 byte encoding)
So, I consider
-- Forwarded message -
From: David Starner
Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode education in Schools
To: Richard Wordingham
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 5:26 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
Hello Chinese experts,
The Letter I in the Bopomofo alphabet (U+3127) has a two rendering variants, a
vertical bar and a horizontal bar.
Can anyone please tell me the context criteria, when should which variant be
used?
Is it VR China using the vertical form (like in font SimSun) and Taiwan
Strings in Java and JavaScript are basically the same as they are arbitrary
sequences of 16-bit code units, and not restricted to text with valid
UTF-16 encoding. The differences are in the set of access methods, but they
are both normally immutable, and both allow (but do enforce) substrings to
IIUC the limitation seems to be only that functions such as "charAt" do not
recognize that surrogates aren't valid characters:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/charAt
via https://stackoverflow.com/a/8716157/1503120.
This is a problem of many
I thought Javascript had a UCS-2 understanding of Unicode strings. Has it
managed to progress beyond that?
Peter
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of David Starner
via Unicode
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 5:18 PM
To: Unicode Mailing List
14 matches
Mail list logo