Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:35:14 +0530 विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki) via Unicode wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:48 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode < > unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:05:35 + > > Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: > The text in IAST that I

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:07 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > However, as a locale for generated text, I feel it is inadequate. > Wouldn't the expansion rules generate saṃti from संति rather than santi > from सन्ति for 'they are'? True. I suppose that someone

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:48 PM Richard Wordingham via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:05:35 + > Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: The text in IAST that I encounter seems not to have ansuvara before > stop consonants. That's typical. Whatever the source

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

I think the 'Latn' in sa-Latn-t-sa-m0-iast is unnecessary, though it partly depends on the range of the IAST transform. If the transformation can only convert to the Roman script then 'Latn' is superfluous; I'm not sure if the extension is formally enough to rule out Devanagari. On the other

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:05:35 + Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: > I'm still trying to work out what to do for IAST. Is it just: > > sa-t-m0-iast > > if one finds that > > sa-Latn > > allows too much latitude? For material that is a transcription rather than a transliteration, are

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

Filed the following, thanks Richard. CLDR-13445 Release link for "latest" goes to zip file On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:31 AM Richard

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:28 AM Markus Scherer wrote: > > The subtag I would use for IAST seems to be: >> sa-Latn-t-sa-m0-iast (https://r12a.github.io/app-subtags/ is unable to >> confirm that the extension >> >> t-sa-m0-iast is

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 01:27:39 + Richard Wordingham wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:09:02 -0800 > Markus Scherer via Unicode wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Roozbeh Pournader via Unicode < > > unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > > > > You don't need an ISO 15924 script code.

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 5:47 PM विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki) via Unicode wrote: > But that says that the definitions are at >> > >> https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/releases/tag/latest/common/bcp47/transform.xml >> , >> but all one currently gets from that is an error message 'XML

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:59 AM Richard Wordingham via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > > You don't need an ISO 15924 script code. You need to think in terms > > > of BCP 47. Sanskrit in Latin would be sa-Latn. > > > > > > > Right! > > > > Now, if you want to distinguish the different

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:09:02 -0800 Markus Scherer via Unicode wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Roozbeh Pournader via Unicode < > unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > > You don't need an ISO 15924 script code. You need to think in terms > > of BCP 47. Sanskrit in Latin would be sa-Latn. > >

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Roozbeh Pournader via Unicode < unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > You don't need an ISO 15924 script code. You need to think in terms of BCP > 47. Sanskrit in Latin would be sa-Latn. > Right! Now, if you want to distinguish the different transcription systems for >

Re: Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

You don't need an ISO 15924 script code. You need to think in terms of BCP 47. Sanskrit in Latin would be sa-Latn. Now, if you want to distinguish the different transcription systems for writing Sanskrit in Latin, you can apply to registry a BCP 47 variant. There are also BCP 47 extension T, which