Re: Support for HTTP/1.0

Joe McIlvain wrote: > We work on an IoT-oriented web service that uses Unicorn. One of our > requirements is to support HTTP/1.0 for low-complexity devices. > > We've noticed that HTTP/1.0 requests to Unicorn always get HTTP/1.1 > responses, which is invalid behaviour for

Support for HTTP/1.0

We work on an IoT-oriented web service that uses Unicorn. One of our requirements is to support HTTP/1.0 for low-complexity devices. We've noticed that HTTP/1.0 requests to Unicorn always get HTTP/1.1 responses, which is invalid behaviour for the HTTP/1.0 protocol. Sure enough, looking through

Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

We work on an IoT-oriented web service that uses Unicorn. One of our requirements is to support HTTP/1.0 for low-complexity devices. We've noticed that HTTP/1.0 requests to Unicorn always get HTTP/1.1 responses, which is invalid behaviour for the HTTP/1.0 protocol. Sure enough, looking through

Re: Master wait time metric

Brilliant, this will make it super easy to write a Prometheus exporter, will post here once I am done. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Eric Wong wrote: > Sam Saffron wrote: >> Hi Eric / everyone :) >> >> I would like to start graphing how long our master