On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Petko pditc...@gmail.com wrote:
First a few notes :
1. The feature in question is very old ,and a lot of people have their way
around it .
2. Inheriting the info from 1. - I'm not quite sure how many people (old
as they may be) have a problem with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thibaut Brandscheid wrote on 13/12/12 00:01:
... This is a real world problem, I've multiple times rearranged
the sorting for an elderly man in Thunderbird (he has the same
problem in Nautilus but not enough files to get lost there). Thats
an
First a few notes :
1. The feature in question is very old ,and a lot of people have their
way around it .
2. Inheriting the info from 1. - I'm not quite sure how many people
(old as they may be) have a problem with the feature. What is our
representative sample ?
I'm having these thoughts
Why can't the implementation be global? The existing sort interface is
globally implemented by Gtk.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Petko pditc...@gmail.com wrote:
My two cents : I don't think that removing the bar with the column names
is inappropriate - it's just needed to understand the
On 11 December 2012 22:00, Thibaut Brandscheid randal...@web.de wrote:
As well as being simple for a basic user facilities that more
sophisticated users need must be provided. Next you will be
suggesting removing split screen and tree view from Nautilus. No-one
would ever suggest that.
I would like to suggest the removal of all Sort-By buttons in all
applications shipped with Ubuntu.
The reasons:
- they can break the UX in an app for an average user completely
- they are rarely used
- we don't need them
Instead make a default how content should be sorted in Ubuntu and stick to
just because an application ships with ubuntu doesn't mean that ubuntu has
anything to do with actually working on the program.
you're probably better off sending this to the developers of each
application.
personally, i'm against the idea.
it is true that i rarely use them and do ignore them for
I would hate this too, even if you seldomly use it, doesn't need you
won't find it infuriating that it went away when you'll actually need
it. I'm pretty sure people would hate to have them removed.
Le 11/12/2012 21:10, Josh Strawbridge a écrit :
just because an application ships with ubuntu
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Josh Strawbridge
holyknightjos...@gmail.com wrote:
just because an application ships with ubuntu doesn't mean that ubuntu has
anything to do with actually working on the program.
I'm aware about that. The reason why I post it here is because I think it's
an
As well as being simple for a basic user facilities that more
sophisticated users need must be provided. Next you will be
suggesting removing split screen and tree view from Nautilus. No-one
would ever suggest that.
The split view is not a feature in the main UI window of nautilus causing
I believe what I'm about to say have been said more than a thousand times
before, but still, I feel like adding some weight. Rather than adress this
remove sort button proposal (considering it is not a troll); I'd like
make a stance against this reductionist mentality. The more a software can
do,
Am Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:55:40 +0100
schrieb Thibaut Brandscheid randal...@web.de:
Yes, we need the sort functionality, but do we need this
one-click-buttons in the front UI?
If you would have to go to the settings, or would have to right click
to unlock and make the Sort-By buttons visible and
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Gregory Merchan
gregory.merc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Ian Santopietro isan...@gmail.com wrote:
What about moving the sort functionality to a menu? Then, it can be easily
accessed through HUD, preserving easy access fit who use
13 matches
Mail list logo
